«کارکرد نحو روایی (مدل کنشگران) و پیرنگ در منظومه ی ویس و رامین»

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه ارومیه

چکیده

گذر از سلیقه در توصیف و ارزیابی کیفیت اثر ادبی و به‌کارگیری نقد ادبی در جایگاه مرجعی علمی برای ارزش‌گذاری آثار، مطلوبی است که همواره بسیاری از نظریه‌پردازان و منتقدان ادبی در پی آن هستند. روایت‌شناسی با تحلیل نظام حاکم بر روایت‌ها و کشف ارتباط میان عناصر سازنده‌ی روایت، در این راستا می‌کوشد. در این نوشتار کوشش شده است تا ساختار روایی داستان ویس و رامین به‌عنوان یکی از برجسته‌ترین منظومه‌های غنایی، بررسی‌ شده و نحو روایی و در پی آن پیرنگی که مدل کنشگران بر بستر آن قرار می‌گیرد، تحلیل شود. پژوهش حاضر به روش توصیفی‌تحلیلی و منابع به‌کاررفته در آن اسنادی‌کتابخانه‌ای است. دستاوردهای پژوهش گویای این است که جایگاه والای این منظومه در ادبیات روایی به‌دلیل کارکرد درست عناصر در قوانین روایت‌شناسی است. طرح داستان از ساختار و انسجام روایی برخوردار بوده و چهار نحو روایی دارد که همگی در خدمت روایت هستند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Function of narrative syntax (model of actors) and plot in Weiss and Ramin systems

نویسندگان [English]

  • Anita Kkhaleghi
  • Alireza Mozaffari
  • Abdolnaser Nazariani
urmia
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Every work of art is a combination of structure and beauty. Aesthetic values ​​are in the role of the building blocks of a work of art, and a principled and purposeful structure can be used to apply them. The arrangement of aesthetic values ​​depends on the structure of the work; That is, a proper structure contributes to the relationship between aesthetic values.
Narratology, as a science, strives to achieve clear narrative patterns. Propp and Garms are theorists who have defined narrative based on the actions of actors. The role model is one of the most important tools that provides semantic cues to critics. With the help of this model of action, it is possible to understand the presence or absence of internal coherence between narrative elements. Pirang is another important theoretical issue in the field of semantics and narratology with a constructivist approach and the most important part of a narrative and it can be considered as one of the most important elements related to the model of actors on which the coherence of the narrative structure depends.
Weiss and Ramin is a Persian lyric poem that has always had a high place in Persian literature. In the present study, we have tried to establish this position by using Garms theory and by prescribing scientific frameworks.
Method, Precedent, research goal
This research is a descriptive-analytical method and the sources used in it are library documents.
Babak Ahmadi (1991) in the book Structure and Interpretation of the text and (2017) the book from visual signs to the text took a big step in introducing the development of new approaches to narratology. Ahmad Okhot (1992) also tried to prove the compatibility of Persian literature with them by introducing the theories related to narratology by writing the book Grammar of the Story. Other authors such as Hamid Reza Shairi (2002) with the book Basics of Modern Semantics, Ali Abbasi (2016) with the book Applied Narrative and Mohammad Hadi Mohammadi and Ali Abbasi (2002) with the book Samad Structure of a myth in introducing this scientific approach and localization of this Theories have made a significant contribution.
The purpose of this study is to prove the coherence of the plot and the narrative of Weiss and Ramin based on the structuralism of Propp and Garms.
Discussion
This narrative consists of four action models, each of which is based on a plot. The first and second action models work in parallel in a contradictory relationship to achieve a goal and form an independent story.
Following these plots, a new story begins with two other action models, both of which (in conjunction with Weiss and in conjunction with Ramin) operate in parallel; But the relationship between them is interactive and they advance the narrative to achieve a common goal. The plot on which these two narratives are based is the same.
In Weiss and Ramin's narrative, we are faced with two types of plots: linear plots that follow each other and parallel plots that tell the story at the same time. These plots themselves fall into two groups of confrontation and interaction.
In Weiss and Ramin, it can be seen that a fictional character is placed in the position of two actors. Sometimes these two positions of action have an interactive relationship with each other and move towards a goal; In the first plot, the target (viro) acts in the position of the actor, and in the second plot, the midwife appears in the position of the actor and the actor. This shows the importance of these fictional characters in the narrative; Because they take on the narration of an important part of the story and by being in two positions, they bring the most help to the active actor to reach the goal. In some cases, the actions of the actors change; That is, from the front of helping the active actor, they are transferred to the opposite front. As in action model First, the actor (city) has become a deterrent actor, and in action model second we see this change in city action. Given the material motivation of the city for this change of action, the most important feedback received from the analysis of his position in these models of action is the realization of his shaky personality and the sudden change of direction of the narrative.
By summarizing the initial and final parts and devoting as much volume as possible to the middle part, the author has created a fit and a principle of uniformity that causes order and coherence in the story of Weiss and Ramin.
Conclusion
Weiss and Ramin's lyrical system is a narrative based on Grimas structuralist theory that has a complete structural pattern and narrative; Because in addition to having three initial, middle and final parts, the element of change is also seen in it. Also, based on the type of text that was chosen (narration), there is a kind of semantic coherence in it and no part of the anecdote is ineffective in advancing the flow of narration. This is a privilege that many literary works lack.
Another feature of the story of Weiss and Ramin is the multiplicity of narrative syntax and plot in this work, which shows the complexity of the narrative. There is more than one plot in a long narrative of tricks that prevent the audience from getting bored and accompany him with the narrator.
Despite the various narrative patterns in Weiss and Ramin, Weiss is a fixed point around which other elements revolve, which contributes to the coherence of the text.
The result of the above results is the proof of the high position of Weiss and Ramin's system on the basis of a lawful and scientific system that responds to linguistic theories after nine centuries and has the ability to make the audience have a better reading based on scientific theories.
Keywords: action pattern, plot, narratology, grimace, narrative syntax, Weiss and Ramin.
 
Resources
Abbasi, Ali (1385). "Research on the Pirang Element". Journal of the Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Tehran, Volume 11, Number 33, pp. 108-85.
_________. (1395). Applied narratology. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Ahmadi, Babak (1370). Text structure and interpretation; Semiotics and structuralism, Tehran: Markaz.
_______ (1396). From visual signs to text, Tehran: Markaz.
Asaberger, Arthur. (1380). Narration in popular culture; Media and everyday life. Translated by Mohammad Reza Liravi, Tehran: Soroush.
Bertens, Hans (1387). Fundamentals of Literary Theory. Translated by Mohammad Reza Abolghasemi, Tehran: Mahi.
Chenani, Fatemeh and Piri. (1395). "Narrative of the story of Bijan and Manijeh based on the model of Grimas and Genet". Studies in Literature, Mysticism and Philosophy, Volume 2, Number 2/2, pp. 148-161.
Dehghani, Nahid (1390). "Analytical study of the structure of narrative in the discovery of Mahjoub Hojviri based on the semiotic model of Garmas narrative", Literary Text Research Quarterly, No. 48, pp. 9-32.
Dezfulian, Kazem and Fouad Moloudi. (1390). "Analysis of Al-Tair region based on narratology". Scientific-Research Quarterly of Persian Language and Literature Research, No. 20, pp. 113-120.
Gorgani, Fakhreddin Asad. (1395). Weiss and Ramin. Edited by Mojtaba Minavi, Tehran: Hirmand.
Mohammadi, Mohammad Hadi (1378). Methodology of criticizing children's literature. Tehran: Soroush.
Mohammadi, Mohammad Hadi and Ali Abbasi. (1381). Samad: The structure of a myth. Tehran: Chista.
Nabiloo, Alireza. "Narrative of the story of the boom and the crow in Kelileh and Demneh". Journal of Literature Research, Volume 4, Number 14, pp. 7- 28.
Okhovvat, Ahmad (1371). Grammar of the story. Tehran: Farda.
 
Rafatkhah, Fatemeh and Ali Tasnimi (2015). "Analysis of Weiss and Ramin Stories Based on Narrative Theories". Conference of the Iranian Persian Language and Literature Promotion Association. Volume 11, pp. 1747 - 1775.
Rouhani, Massoud and Ali Akbar Shobkolaei. (1391). "Analysis of the story of Sheikh Sanan in Attar region based on Garmas action theory". Research in Mystical Literature, Volume 6, Number 22.
 
Scholes, Robert (1383). An Introduction to Structuralism in Literature. Translated by Farzaneh Taheri, Tehran: Agah.
Shaeeri, Mohammad Reza (1381). Fundamentals of Modern Semantics, Tehran: Samt.
Taqwa Kotanani Alireza (1395). "Study and analysis of the personality element in Weiss and Ramin by Fakhreddin Asad Gorgani". Conference on Communication, Persian Language and Literature and Linguistic Studies.
____________ (1396). "Recognizing the plot element of the story in Masnavi Weiss and Ramin Fakhreddin Asad Gorgani". Conference on modern research in Iran and the world in management, economics, accounting and humanities.
Wallace, Martin. (1382). Narrative theories. Translated by Mohammad Shahba, Tehran: Hermes.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Narrative syntax
  • action pattern
  • plot
  • narrative
  • Grimas
  • Wiss and Ramin
آسابرگر، آرتور. (1380). روایت در فرهنگ عامیانه؛ رسانه و زندگی روزمره. ‌ترجمه‌ی محمدرضا لیراوی، تهران: سروش.
احمدی، بابک. (1370). ساختار و تأویل متن؛ نشانه‌شناسی و ساختارگرایی. تهران: مرکز.
ـــــــــــــ. (1396). از نشانههای تصویری تا متن. تهران: مرکز.
اخوت، احمد. (1371). دستور زبان داستان. تهران: فردا.
اسکولز، رابرت. (1383). درآمدی بر ساختارگرایی در ادبیات. ترجمه‌ی فرزانه طاهری، تهران: آگه.
برتنس، هانس. (1387). مبانی نظریه‌ی ادب. ‌ترجمه‌ی محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، تهران: ماهی.
تقوی کوتنانی، علیرضا. (1395). «بررسی و تحلیل عنصر شخصیت در ویس و رامین اثر فخرالدین اسعد گرگانی». همایش ارتباطات، زبان و ادبیات فارسی و مطالعات زبانشناختی.
____________  (1396). «شناخت عنصر پیرنگ (طرح) داستان در مثنوی ویس و رامین فخرالدین اسعد گرگانی». همایش پژوهشهای نوین ایران و جهان در مدیریت، اقتصاد، حسابداری و علوم انسانی.
چنانی، فاطمه و پیری. (1395). «روایت‌شناسی داستان بیژن و منیژه بر اساس الگوی گریماس و ژنت». مطالعات ادبیات، عرفان و فلسفه، دوره‌ی2، شماره‌ی2/2، صص148-161.
دزفولیان، کاظم و فؤاد مولودی. (1390). «تحلیل منطق‌الطیر بر پایه‌ی روایت‌شناسی». پژوهش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، شماره‌ی20، صص 113– 120.
دهقانی، ناهید. (1390). «بررسی  تحلیلی ساختار روایت در کشف‌المحجوب هجویری بر اساس الگوی نشانه‌شناسی روایی گرماس».  متنپژوهی ادبی، شماره‌ی48، صص9- 32.
رفعت‌خواه، فاطمه و علی تسنیمی. (1395). «تحلیل داستان ویس و رامین بر اساس نظریه‌های روایت‌شناسی». همایش انجمن ترویج  زبان و ادبیات فارسی ایران، دوره‌ی11، صص 1747 – 1775.
روحانی، مسعود و علی‌اکبر شوبکلایی. (1391). «تحلیل داستان شیخ صنعان منطق‌الطیر عطار بر اساس نظریه‌ی کنشی گرماس». پژوهشهای ادب عرفانی، سال6، شماره‌ی 22، صص89-112.
شعیری، محمدرضا. (1381). مبانی معناشناسی نوین. تهران: سمت. 
عباسی، علی. (1385). «پژوهشی بر عنصر پیرنگ». پژوهش‌نامه‌ی دانشکده‌ی زبان‌های خارجی دانشگاه تهران، دوره‌ی11، شماره‌ی33، صص85-103.
_________. (1395). روایت‌شناسی کاربردی. تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
گرگانی، فخرالدین اسعد. (1395). ویس و رامین. ‌تصحیح مجتبی مینوی، تهران: هیرمند.
محمدی، محمدهادی. (1378). روش‌شناسی نقد ادبیات کودکان. تهران: سروش .
محمدی، محمدهادی و علی عباسی. (1381). صمد: ساختار یک اسطوره. تهران: چیستا.
نبی‌لو، علیرضا. (1389). «روایت‌شناسی داستان بوم و زاغ در کلیله و دمنه». ادبپژوهی، دوره‌ی4، شماره‌ی14، صص 7- 28.
والاس، مارتین. (1382). نظریه‌های روایت. به‌ترجمه‌ی محمد شهبا، تهران: هرمس.