Leila Galehdaran
Abstract
Poesia in atto: Summoning the body, The originality of the voice, The presence condition in act of the Totus Corpus Leila Galehdaran, Assistant Professor in Dramatic ...
Read More
Poesia in atto: Summoning the body, The originality of the voice, The presence condition in act of the Totus Corpus Leila Galehdaran, Assistant Professor in Dramatic Literature in Shiraz Art University, Shiraz, Iran, l_galehdaran@shirazartu.ac.ir In the beginning, poetry was an art expressed through oral composition and song; a practice that was passed down from generation to generation. It was committed to memory with no physical transcription. The invention of the syllabary by the Sumerians (4000 B.C) led to new achievements, allowing for abstract and intangible concepts to be conceived and written. Reading and writing began and spread, and from this point on, poetry began its evolution from oral to written. Poesia in atto, as a post-performative poetry, with an etymological and ontological approach examines Mesopotamian and ancient Greek poetry, some of the Marinetti approaches in futurism, Antonin Artaud’s space poetry, and the Performance poetry of the eighties in America. The term Poesia in atto was used for the first time in the Italian language in the PhD thesis of Leili Galehdaran, in the Sapienza University (Rome, Italy) between 2009 and 2013. The English term chosen is ACTIOn Poetry. Actio is a theater acting technique that incorporates all the factors of the metalanguage, tone, gesture that accompany the speech.This descriptive article (extracted from a thesis based on descriptive - empirical method) through an etymological and ontological approach, examines poetry between Mesopotamia and ancient Greece, some of the approaches of Marinetti's futurism, Antonin Artaud's space poetry and American performance poetry of the 1980s. It presents characteristics and parameters, new and integrated, which are the result of a rereading of theoretical essays and speeches and of the product of the poet's personal experience. The explanation of its principles and particularities was done through trial and error and laboratory analysis on poems, exercises and tests before the performances and during their execution. To obtain the personal acting ability, the scope of the essays has been expanded thanks to experimental studies on the works of others; Works that were not in the field of poetry or performance poetry but theatrical works that were produced with the artistic research of post-dramatic theater groups that worked on poem as a theatrical text and focused on sound, voice, music and noise as well as on auditory aspects and have been studied on a case-by-case basis. Thus, for the section of voice, vocalism and acting, Ermanna Montanari, the actress of the Teatro delle Albe, was taken as a perfect example to study and imitate. For the section of the body, the opinion of Cesare Ronconi, director of the Teatro Valdoca was chosen as a good example for studying the body. For the sound and noise section, a work by Chiara Guidi of the Sosciètas Raffaello Sanzio was chosen to deepen the techniques and classify the types of sounds, noises and listening.Poesia in atto is a post-performative poetry based on the ancient foundation of orality, rhetoric and Khonyagari (minstrelsy), and its Trinitarian components are body, voice and presence. Poesia in atto is a poem extracted from the voice and the present and living body of the poet, for the present and living body of the public, therefore it is the art of the body and not just the art of language. It is a poem that, while being free from pen and paper in its composition, not only has all the formal components of poetry in general, but also has something more than what existed in its essence and origin but has retained itself in the time and in the domain of writing. The poem in act is a poem of singing aloud, and since writing is no longer the main and pivotal factor of the poem, other parameters such as: voice, sound, noise, music, gesture, mimicry, movement, space and light in the poetry composition process have the same value as language, and this value of the elements leads to the construction of a plural body, a multidimensional space and, ultimately, a totus corpus in action which is poetry. Therefore, considering the fundamental and innate differences between Poesia in atto and Performance poetry and the misconceptions that their performative commonalities create, this article introduces Poesia in atto and discusses the following: What are the differences between Poesia in atto and Performance poetry? The main differences can be noted between Poesia in atto and Performance Poetry, which are rooted in the foundation of the poem: In Poesia in atto, as in Performance Poetry, the poet is not whom that performs the poem, but is an intertwined and transformed part of totus corpus; Language in ongoing poetry has changed the genre of poetry; The executive structure of the Poesia in atto derived from this language which has been a change of genre is not something subsequent and added to the post-compositional process; therefore, although the executive structure of the Poesia in atto is more intertwined in the language, and the totus corpus is more complete and united, only one executive form will be possible for a poem.The results obtained in this descriptive article reveal that Poesia in atto is not a performance of written poetry. Instead, it is a poem inseparable in its performative structure and incomparable in its components of body, voice, and presence. Poesia in atto is created in Totus Corpus (a total body), inseparable from its components, all at once to re-embody the essence of poetry in the presence of the audience through performance. One of the literary achievements of Poesia in atto is the expansion of literary techniques and the invention of new metric of poetry which also offers a new art of rhetoric. Keywords: Poesia in atto, ACTIOn Poetry, Leili Galehdaran, Totus Corpus, Space Poetry, Performance Poetry. Farsi Refrences: Ahmadi, Babak. (2014). Heidegger and the Fundamental Question, 7th Edition, Tehran: Markaz Publications.Artaud, Antonin. (2004). The Theatre and Its Double, Nasrin Khattat, Tehran:Ghatreh.Barthes, Roland. (2015). S/Z. Sepideh Shokripour, Tehran: Afraz.Barthes, Roland. (2010). The Pleasure of the Text. Payam Yazdanjoo, 5th Edition, Tehran: Markaz.Bracket, (1996). World Theater History, Vol. 1, Houshang Azadivar, 2th Edition, Tehran: Morvarid.Burton, David Lee. (2013). The Sociology of the Body, Nasser Fakouhi, 2th Edition. Tehran: Sales.Derrida, Jacques. (2026). Of Grammatology, Mehdi Parsa, Third edition, Tehran: shavand.Galehdaran, Leili. (2013). “About my poetic mentality” in Gardeshgaran Bushehr, 1st year, 2th Issue. 2. Bushehr.Galehdaran, Leili. (2014). “The destiny of any poem is to be heard one day”, in Armandaily, 24 May 2014, n. 2477, Tehran.Galehdaran, Leili. (2015). “About Poesia in atto”, in Dena gallery brochure, 23 July 2015, Tehran.Galehdaran, Leili. (2016). “I consider written poetry as silent poetry”. Poetry case of Leili Galehdaran in Qoqnoos, 14th year, n. 460, Bushehr.Galehdaran, Leili. (2017). “Poesia in atto”, in Cinema and Literature, 14th year, n. 62, Tehran.Galehdaran, Leili. (2017). “Poesia in atto”, in Cinema and Literature, 14th year, n. 63, Tehran.Heidegger, Martin. (2010). Poetry, Language, Thought [poetry, language and thought of liberation (in Persian)], Abbas Manouchehri, Tehran: Molavi Publications.Kerrigan, Kate. (2017). Sociology of the Body, Mohsen Naserirad, 2th edition, tehran: Naghsh va Negar.Kim Yen, Racher. (2011). Understanding and receiving music, Hossein Yasini, 11th Edition, Tehran: Cheshmeh.Lehmann, Hans - Thies. (2004). Postdramatic Theatre, Nadali Hamedani, Tehran: Ghatreh.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (2021). The World of Perception, Farzad Jaber-al-Ansar, 5th Edition, Tehran: Plato, (2020). Five Dialogues [Laches, Lysis, Ion, Protagoras, Symposium] , Mahmoud Sanai, Tehran: Hermes.Plato, (2020). Four Dialogues [Menon, Phaedrus, Theaetetus, Hippias Major], Mahmoud Sanai, Tehran: Hermes.Sattari, Jalal. (2011). Culture and Pluge, Tehran: Markaz.Seyed-Hosseini, Reza. (2015). Literary Schools, Vol.2, 18th Edition, Tehran: Negah.Schechner, Richard. (2015). The Performance Mehdi Nasrollahzadeh, 3th Edition, Tehran: Samt.Zarrinkoub, Abdolhossein. (2014). Aristotel and Poetics, 9th Edition, Tehran: Amirkabir.Zeimaran, Mohammad. (2016). Jacques Derrida and The Metaphysics of presence. 3th Edition. Tehran: Hermes. Latin References: Artaud, Antonin. (1968). Il teatro e il suo doppio, trad. Gian Renzo Morteo e Guido Neri, Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.Baranti, R, Bohem, G. (2004). Ecologia della musica, Saggi sul paesaggio sonoro, a cura di Antonello Colomberti, Roma: Donzelli.Bologna, Corrado. (1992). Flatus vocis. Metafisica e antropologia della voce, Bologna: Il Mulino.Cavarero, Adriana. (2003). A più voci. Filosofia dell’espressione vocale, Milano: Feltrinelli.De Dominicis, Amedeo. (2002). La voce come bene culturale, Roma: Carocci.De Marinis, Marco. (2004). Visioni della scena, Teatro e scrittura, Roma – Bari: Laterza.De Marinis, Marco. (2007). Geroglifici del soffio: poesia-attore-voce fra Artaud e Decroux nel novecento teatrale, in «Degrés», nn. 129-130, Bruxelles.Derrida, (1967). La voix et le phénomène, Edizione italiana a cura di G. Dalmasso, La voce e il fenomeno, Milano: Jaca Book, 1968.Innocenti, Loretta. (1985). La voce fuori campo, Firenze: La Casa Usher.Finter, Helga. (2012). “La vove atopica: Presenza dell’assenza”, in Drammaturgie sonore, Roma: Bulzoni Editore.Fónagy, Ivan. (1983). La vive voix. Essais de psycho-phonétique, Paris: Editions Payot.Galehdaran, Leili. (2020). Teatro, Poesia, Vocalità, Roma: Bulzoni Editore.Galehdaran, Leili. (2013). Teatro –vocalità; Poesia in atto, La tesi di Ph. D in Tecnologie digitali e metodologie per la ricerca sullo spettacolo, Facoltà Letter e Filosofia in Sapienza Università di Roma.Gasparini, Francesca. (2009). Poesia come corpo-voce. Ipotesi teoriche e esempi novecenteschi (Yeats, Lorca, Artaud, Bene), Roma: Bulzoni.Gentili, Bruno. (1984). Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica, Da Omero al V secolo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Kristeva, Julia. (1979). La rivoluzione del’linguaggio poetico, Venezia: Marsilio.Levy, Pierre. (1997). Il ritual, Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern, University Press. (Original work published 1964).Nancy, Jean-Luc. (2004). All'ascolto, trad. Enrica Lisciani Petrini, Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Nancy, Jean-Luc. (1995). La comunità inoperosa, Napoli: Cronopio.Onians, Richard Broxton. (2006). Le origini del pensiero europeo, Milano: Adelfi.Otto, Walter Friedrich. (2006). L'esprit de la religion grecque ancienne. Theophania, Paris: POCKETPitozzi, Enrico. (2012). "Dissecito: anatomie del corpo sonoro", in Drammaturgie sonore, Teatro del secondo Novecento, (a cura di Valentina Valentini), Roma: Bulzoni Editore, pp. 285-314.Phelan, Peggy. (1993). Ontology of Performance: representation whitout reproduction in unmarked. The politics of performance, London: Routledge.Serra, Carlo. (2008). Musica, corpo, espressione, Macerata: Quodlibet.Wheeler, Lesley. (2008). Voicing American Poetry: Sound and Performance from the 1920s to the present. NY: Cornell UP.Zumthor, Paul. (2001). La presenza della voce. Introduzione alla poesia orale, Bologna:Il Mulino.Zumthor, Paul. (1990). Poesia dello spazio. Nuovi territori per una nuova oralità, in «La taverna di Auerbach», nn. 0-10, 1990.
