دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 The story of Separation, from Varqā to Parrot (Comparison of the descent of the soul in the Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode and the Narāqi's Masnavī Tāqdīs) حکایت هجران، از ورقا تا طوطی(بررسی مقایسه‌ای مقوله‌ی هبوط روح در قصیده‌ی عینیه‌ی ابن‌سینا و مثنوی طاقدیس ملااحمد نراقی) 1 28 6343 10.22099/jba.2021.39738.3972 FA رقیه اسدی خانشان گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی. دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی. دانشگاه ارومیه عبدالناصر نظریانی گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی. دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی. دانشگاه ارومیه علیرضا مظفری استاد دانشگاه ارومیه 0000-0002-9586-4527 Journal Article 2021 02 08 Introduction : One of the important intellectual foundations of Islamic mysticism is the belief in the kingdom of the soul and its derivation from the Alawite world and its confinement in the earthly body. In the Islamic world, Ibn Sīnā first portrayed this belief in Ayniyya ode with an allegory Ibn Sīnā's allegory is shaped by the symbol of Varqā or pigeons, and this pigeon descends from its high place and is captured in body cage. In one of the stories of Tāqdīs, the story of Parrot and Shah, Mulla Ahmad Narāqi advances belief in the fall of the soul, like Ayniyya ode, with the allegory of the bird. At first glance, it is obvious that the bird in Tāqdīs is parrot, and in Ayniyya is pigeons, as well as the language of Tāqdīs, Persian and its poetic form is Mathnavi, while the language of Ayniyya ode is Arabic and its poetic form is Ode. However, the points of sharing and differentiating these two works require careful examination. The present article deals with this issue. Accordingly, the main issue of the present study is the expression of the points of commonality and differentiation between the story of parrot and shah from Mathnavi Tāqdīs Mulla ahmad Narāqi and Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode. Methodology, background and purpose : Research Methodology The method of this article is analytical-comparative method, considering that the base of allegory of both poems is the same, commonalities and differentiations in paying this allegory will be determined, analyzed and compared with each other. Research background : Several articles have been written separately about the Ayniyya ode and Mathnavi Tāqdīs, including the articles "The Gnusian Structure of Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode ", "Symbolism in Ibn Sīnā's Ode and its Reflection in the Thought of Muslim Mystics", "Comparative Study of Two Objective: Ibn Sīnā's Mystical Ayniyya Ode and Ali Via Eram-Nasib Al-Arida". Analysis of Mathnavi Tāqdīs and its impressed by Mathnawi" and "Molanaye Naraq and Mathnavi Tāqdīs", but as their titles show, none of the authors compared the story of Parrot and Shah Mathnavi Tāqdīs to the Allegorical content of Ayniyya ode. Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to explain the points of commonality and differentiation between the allegorical story of parrot and shah from Mulla ahmad Narāqi's Tāqdīs Mathnavi and Ibn Sīnā's Ayniyya ode. Discussion: The similarities between parrot and shah's story and Ayniyya ode: The descent of the soul from the high world: 1. The most important similarity between parrot and shah's story with the Ayniyya ode is the unity of their main theme that’s mean belief in the the descent of the soul from the high world and its Imprisonment in the prison of the body. Captivity of the soul in the flesh : 2. In their poems, both Ibn Sīnā and Narāqi refer to the captivity of the soul in the flesh and speak of the reluctance of the soul of this confinement. Soul moaning from parting : 3. In both works, the soul whines on parting its original homeland. soul desire to reach the joiner: In both works the soul is in the desire to reach the joiner, which is the same as reaching the original homeland. The material world is like Ruined. Both works see the material world as ruins for the soul. Cause of soul's descension : Both works consider the cause of descension of the soul to be perfection and awareness. Cause of Forgetting the Quds Court : Both works state that the soul, because of belonging to the body and engaging in its needs and other manifestations of the material world, forgets its original origin and homeland, which is the shrine of Quds. The upward trajectory of the soul : In both works, the soul, despite its descension , ultimately has an upward trajectory and will return to its homeland. The differences between parrot and shah's story and the Ayniyya ode: Differences in allegorical birds : 1. The bird that Ibn Sīnā has chosen is a pigeon, but Narāqi has used parrot allegory, which is interesting considering its eloquence and imitatet. Reaction and non-reaction of the soul to accept the descension: 2. As a result of Ibn Sīnā, the pigeon reluctantly welcomes travel, but there is no parrot reaction as a result of Narāqi. The devil's involvement and non-interference in the oblivion of the original homeland : In the work of Narqi, contrary to Satan's objectives, he is also involved in the oblivion of the original homeland. Presence and absence of guidance in the downward trend : Objectively, the guide allegory is not used. Usage and non-usage of philosophical discussions and terms : In the same terminology, questions and astonishments of philosophy are raised that these things are not seen in the Narāqi,s work. Conclusion Undeniably, the story of "Parrot and the Shah" , Masnavi, "Mullah Ahmad Narāqi", regardless of the difference in language and poetic form, is similar to the Ayniyya ode of " Ibn Sīnā" in terms of allegorical and themes. This similarity has been carried out in two main aspects of meaning and form. In terms of meaning, the idea of the soul 's descension from the realm of the kingdom to the material world and his captivity in prison and his attempts to get rid of this prison constitute the theme of two works. Also, in terms of form, both effects are based on the coded allegory of bird,in the first is pigeon and in the second is parrot. In general, the common points of the themes of these two works are: The descent of the soul from the high world, The captivity of the soul in the flesh,Soul moaning from parting, soul desire to reach the joiner, The material world is like Ruined, the cause of the fall of the soul, the cause of the oblivion of the Quds Court and the upward course of the soul and the differentiation points of their themes: the reaction and lack of reaction of the soul to accept the fall, interference and non-interference of satan in the oblivion of the main homeland, the presence and absence of guide in the downward trajectory and using and not using philosophical discussions and terms. Keywords: Ibn Sīnā, Ayniyyah ode, Mullā Ahmad Narāqi, Masnavi Tāqdīs, Descent of the Soul. Refrences The Holy Quran, (2002) Translation: Khorramshahi, Mohammad, Fourth Edition, Jami Publications, Niloufar Publications Izdehi, Seyed Sajjad (2007) Political Thought of Mullah Ahmad Narāqi, Qom, Third Edition, Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture Bagheri Taherinia, Ali (2008) Shamim Tāqdīs, Qom, Tebyan Cultural and Information Institute Pournamdarian, Taghi (2010) Mysteries and mysterious stories in Persian literature, seventh edition, scientific and cultural publications Taqi, Shokoofeh, (2008) Mysticism and Philosophy in Ibn Sīnā's treatise, second edition, Publishing Center Sajjadi, Seyed Jafar, (1373) Dictionary of Mystical Terms and Interpretations, Volume 3, Koomesh Publications Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza, (2009) More Logic (Introduction and Correction), Lecture Publications Forouzanfar, Badieh- Jorjani, Ali Ibn Mohammad, (1421 AH) Definitions, Publications: Dar al-Kitab al-Almiyeh, Lebanon Al-Zaman (1373) Sharh Masnavi Manavi, part two, third edition, Zavar Publications Kashani, Mullah Habib, (1378) Labab al-Alqab, Mostafavi Press Goharin, Sadegh, (1368) Description of Sufism terms, Zovar Publications Mojtabaei, Fathollah, (1341) History of Iranian Literature from Ferdowsi to Saadi by Edward Granville Brown, translation of the first half of the second volume of Iranian Literary History, Morvarid Publications Majlisi, Mohammad Baqir, (1375) Baharalanvar, Volume 69, Islamic Publications Narāqi, Ahmad, (2011) Masnavi Tāqdīs, correction: Afrasiabi, Ali, second edition, Nahavandi Publications Articles : Ismailpour, Abolghasem (1998) "A Comparative Study of the Introduction to the Spiritual Masnavi and Gnostic Poems", Iran Shenakht, No. 11, p. 17 Iqbal, Abbas (1333) "Explanation of Ibn Sīnā's ode's poem on the state of the soul in Persian by unknown authors in the seventh century", Journal of the Faculty of Literature, First Year, No. 4, pp. 16-28 Babaei, Reza (2002) "Mawlawi Naragh and Masnavi Tāqdīs, the Mirror of Research", No. 73, p.73 Bahonar, Mina (2004) "Historical Trend of Flight Treatises (Flight Secrets)", Kayhan Farhangi, No. 221, p.77 Jalali, Alireza (2005) "Gnostic structure of Ibn Sīnā's ode ode", Philosophical Letter, Volume 1, 2005, No. 2, p. 91 Raufi Mehr, Mohammad (2006) "Translation of the Ode to Ibn Sīnā", Hafez Magazine, No. 13, pp. 41-40 Haqqani Zanjani, Hossein, (2000) "Research in the works of Ibn Sīnā on the proof of the soul", Lessons from the school of Islam, November, Volume 40, Number 8, p. 38 haghshenas, Maryam, Spearham, Davood, (1399) "Analysis of Rumi and Suhrawardi's visual reading of the concept of captivity of the bird of the soul (stories of birds in Masnavi and allegorical treatises)" Religions and Mysticism, Volume 53, Seifi, Mohsen, 53, Spring & Summer, No. 1, p. 28 Asadipour, Ali, "Comparative Study of Themes of Two Mystical Works of Ibn Sīnā and Mesbah al-Arwah Shams al-Diyoun Mohammad Bardsiri Kerman ", Islamic Mysticism (Mysticism and Religions), Spring 2014, Volume 10, Issue 39, p. 8 Seifi, Mohsen, Lotfi Mofrad Niasari, Fatemeh (2012) "A Comparative Study of Two Mystical Odes - Einieh - Ibn Sīnā and Ali Tariq Eram - The Rate of Petition", Lase Mobin Magazine, No. 8, p. 146 Toghyani, Ishaq (2002) "Ghorbat Shams", Applied Sociology, Spring and Summer, No. 13, p.58 Fathollahi, (2009) Ali, Nazari, Ali, "Symbolism of the Ayniyya ode and its reflection in the thought of Muslim mystics", Persian Language and Literature Research, No. 14, p.17 Ghasemi Narāqi, Somayeh, Mohaghegh Damad, Seyed Mostafa, (2010) "The meaning of prophecy according to Ibn Sīnā", Hekmat Sinavi, year 14, spring and summer, number 43, page 13 Gorji, Mostafa, Narimani, Ahmad, (2010) "Study and analysis of the Masnavi Tāqdīs and the extent of its impact on the spiritual Masnavi", Book of the Month of Literature, No. 156, p.13 Miri, Seyed Abbas, (2001) March + (2002) April, "A look at the scientific and cultural works of Mullah Ahmad Narāqi on the occasion of the Congress of Farazin Narāqi", Mah Din Book Magazine, No. 53 and 54, p.18 حکایت هجران، از ورقا تا طوطی (بررسی مقایسه‌ای مقوله‌ی هبوط روح در قصیده‌ی عینیه‌ی ابن‌سینا و مثنوی طاقدیس ملااحمد نراقی) رقیه اسدی خانشان* عبدالناصر نظریانی ** علیرضا مظفری*** چکیده قصیده‌ی عینیه‌ی ابن‌سینا اثری عرفانی و رمزی است که در آن روح به‌شکل پرنده تصویر می‌شود و از عالم ملکوت به عالم ملک هبوط می‌کند. هرچند اندیشه‌ی هبوط روح قرن‌ها قبل در اندیشه و ادبیات گنوسی مطرح شده بود، این مبحث از ابن‌سینا به بعد در آثار منثور و منظوم عارفان مسلمان، در قالب تمثیل پرنده ارائه شده‌ است. ازجمله‌ی آن‌ها می‌توان به ملااحمد نراقی (1185یا1186-1245ق) اشاره کرد که در داستان طوطی و شاه مثنوی طاقدیس، به‌شکلی تمثیلی به این مقوله می‌پردازد. مقاله‌ی حاضر پس از ذکر مقدمه‌ای درباره‌ی هبوط روح و نماد کبوتر در رسالة‌الطیرها، با روش تحلیلی-مقایسه‌ای به بیان نقاط اشتراک و افتراق دو اثر داستان طوطی و شاه و قصیده‌ی عینیه پرداخته است و سرانجام در این دو اثر شباهت‌هایی مانندِ نزول روح از عالم بالا، اسارت روح در جسم، ناله‌ی روح از فراق و وصال‌طلبی روح و تفاوت‌هایی مانندِ واکنش و نبود ‌واکنش روح برای پذیرش هبوط و دخالت و عدم‌دخالت شیطان در فراموشی وطن اصلی، میان این دو اثر به دست آورده است. واژه‌های کلیدی: ابن‌سینا، قصیده‌ی عینیه، ملااحمد نراقی، مثنوی طاقدیس، هبوط روح. * دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ارومیه saeed_urm@yahoo.com (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) ** دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ارومیه a.nazariani@urmia.ac.ir *** استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ارومیه a.mozaffari@urmia.ac.ir تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 20/11/1399 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 31/6/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6343_20b9dc1eda2a0e1b14aeece83fa221b0.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 The Morphology of the Heroic Story “Babr-e Bayān” Based on Vladimir Propp's Theory ریخت‌شناسی داستان پهلوان ببربیان مطابق با نظریه‌ی ولادیمیر پراپ 29 58 6341 10.22099/jba.2021.40927.4057 FA علی رضا تابان مهر (طالبان) دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی یاسوج محمد هادی خالق زاده استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی - واحد یاسوج مهدی فاموری استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه یاسوج Journal Article 2021 06 12 The Morphology of the Heroic Story “Babr-e Bayān” Based on Vladimir Propp's Theory Introduction Some great thinkers worked in the field of narratology including Vladimir Propp. Studying a large number of Russian fairy tales, Propp could define a consistent pattern for these tales; So, he identified 31-function pattern. Once the theories of formalism and constructivism were formed and popularized, Propp developed This type of format and structural analysis of stories. According to the mythical story plot it seems that we can find Vladimir Propp's claimed characters in Babr-e Bayān poem, whose author is unknown, and try to follow the functions. We investigate three stories in this poem: Rostam's battle with an aquatic animal called Babr-e Bayān, making Babr-e Bayān cloth from the skin of the aquatic animal for Rostam, and Faramarz conception; the stories include many fictional propositions which can be examined through the morphological components of the story. Methodology This is an analytical-descriptive article which attempts to investigate the structure of the epic poem of Babr-e Bayān, from an unknown author, based on the theory of Vladimir Propp. The background of the study includes the books of morphology of fairy tales and the historical roots of the fairy tales by Vladimir Propp; also, people such as Todorov, Bremond and Greimas present some ideas about structural analysis of narrative based on Propp's theories. In this regard, there are some articles such as: Criticism of Sequences of Hero's Functions in Propp's Theory of Morphology (Based on the morphology of three stories in Shahnameh) by Khavar Qorbani and Keyvan Gourk, Morphology of Mazandaran war story based on Propp Theory by Bahram Jalalipoor, and Analysis and comparison of the narrative structure of Nezami’s tales, black & sandal domes from Haft Paykar based on Vladimir Propps’ morphological patterns of fairy tales by Fereshteh Naseri, Abdulhossein Farzad, Amir Hossein Mahoozi. However, according to my investigations there are no independent research about the morphilogy of Babr-e Bayān poem based on Propp's theory. This is a library research method article which is done by analytical description of the text. Data Analysis and Discussion Functions pattern in Babr-e Bayān poem According to the 31 functions in Babr-e Bayān poem and the narrative process stages, and based on the 6 stages of planning for the events, complication, transfer, encountering, return, and recognition, which is the stage for functions appearance, narrative structural pattern can be as follows: β ƴ δ ζ εη ϴ AaBC ↑DEF GHJIK ↓ PrRsOL MQEXTUW All of the Propp’s functions can be find in the 6 stages of planning in this epic poem. All the functions can be observed in a symbol: β ƴ δ ζ εη ϴAaBC↑DEFGHJIK↓ PrRsOLMQEXTUW these functions indicate that this epic story is consist of a general movement and some internal movements. 31 functions can be find in the general movement. Another issue is that the story is made of the Propp’s general confrontational movements: M_________W The movements contributed directly to the balance of the stories and any problem will cause the loss of this balance, so by reaching to some kind of final function they return to the story again. A story can consist of one or more movements. The movements can also have different movements. However, it can be also a single story. Meanwhile, these movements excite the story and determine the main structure and theme of the story. The movements of Babr-e Bayān are as follow: β____________ δ A____________C ↑____________ G H____________K O____________M M___________W However, it is necessary to consider two inner movements that occur inside the main movement, since they upset the balance of the narrative. Inside the main movement of the Babr-e Bayān, removing the two movements of “Alborz and Zal confrontation and blackmail on him” and “Galimine Goosh confrontation and submitting to Rostam” also should be considered however, However, they have not caused complexity and disrupted the norm of the story. The general movement of Babr-e Bayān is as follows: Babr-e Bayān crisis which leads to the people complain and the India opinion against him (crisis 1) Killing Babr-e Bayān by Rostam (balance) In this poem, the M__W can be find in a general movement. Motivational elements (Babr-e Bayān should be killed because he injures the Indians) and violence (Babr-e Bayān damages the property of the Indians and set fire to everywhere) affect the functions. Prop also suggested another movement organization based on content of the story: - extension through function of H-I (war and conflict) - extension through function of M-N (hard work) - extension through two functions of H-I and M-N (conflict and hard work) - extension with no function Conclusion The investigation showed 7 characters among the poem all characters. However, some characters played integrated roles; such as Galimine Goosh who has shown not only as the bad man but also found the role of a collaborator through some events. 31 functions of Propp could be find in the morphological representation but not sequentially. Extension of functions was found in the form of conflict-victory which seems that many epic stories follow this extension pattern due to their structure. It seems that Babr-e Bayān is a case which can remove an ambiguity in Shahnameh; despite some opinions who know Babr-e Bayān as a kind of tiger, it, Patyāre, is an aquatic animal that is killed by Rostam and then making cloth from its skin. Keywords: Narratology, Structuralism, Morphology, Vladimir Propp, Babr-e Bayān Poem Refrences Books: - Barth, R. (2008). Structural Analysis of Narrative. Trans: Azin Hosseinzadeh. Tehran: Markaz - Eagleton, T. (2009). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Trans: Abbas Mokhber. Tehran: Markaz - Ferdowsi, A. (2007). Shahnameh (edition by jalal Khaleghi-Motlagh). Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia - Gerard, G. (2019). Narrative Discourse: An Essay In Method. Trans: Masoome Zavarian. Tehran: Samt - Guerin, W. (2016). The Foundations of Literary Criticism. Trans: Farzaneh Taheri. Tehran: Niloofar - Khadish, P. (2008). Morphology of Magical Legends. Tehran: Scientific and cultural publication - Khadish, P., & Davoodimoqadam, F. (2020). Narrative Patterns of Persian Tales and Myths. Tehran: Samt - Khaleqi Motlagh, J., & Dehbashi, A. (2003). Babr-e Bayān, Gol- e ranjha- ye kohan. Tehran: Markaz - McQuillan, M. (2009). The Narrative Reader. Trans: Fatah Mahmoodi. Tehran: Minooye Kherad - Mirsadeqi, J. (1997). Fiction. Tehtan: Sokhan - Okhovat, A. (1992). On literature The Grammar of Stories. Isfahan: Farda - Payandeh, H.(2018). Critical Theory : An Interdisciplinary Coursebook (Volume I). Tehran: Samt - Propp, V. (2007). Morphology of the Folktale. Trans: Fereydoon Badrehiey. Tehran: Toos - Propp, V. (2018). Morphology of the Folktale. Trans: Fereydoon Badrehiey. Tehran: Toos - Qafoori, R. (2015). Seven Epic Poems : Bijan Nameh, Kak Koohzad Nameh, Babr-e Bayān, Patyāre, Short Tahmineh Nameh, Long Tahmineh Nameh, Razm Nameh Shekavand Kooh. Tehran : Mirasmaktoob - Safa, Z. (1973). Epic In Iran. Tehran: Amir Kabir - Scholes, R. (2004). An Introduction to Structuralism in Literature. Tran: Farzaneh Taheri. Tehran: Agah - Sorami, GH. (2004). From the Color of Flowers to the Suffering of Thorns. Tehran: Scientific and cultural publication - Wallace, M. (2010). Theories of Narrative. Trans: Mohammad Shahba. Tehran: Hermes Articles: - Aydenloo, S. (1999). Another Approach To The Babr-e Bayān Of Shahnameh. Nameh Parsi. No. 15. Pp: 5-17 - Aydenloo, S. (2015). Seven Poems Following Shahnameh. Jahaneketab. No. 1 & 2. Pp: 17-24 - Mirhashemi, M., Saadatinia, Z. (2016). The Morphology of Mahan Mesry's Legend Based on the Theory of Vladimir Propp. Journal of Literary Text Research. Volume 20. No. 70. Pp: 73-89 - Qafoori, R. (2014). Rostam’s Battle With Patyāre: Another Narration Of The Babr-e Bayān. Textual Criticism of Persian Literature; Faculty of Letters & Humanities. University of Isfahan. New issue. No. 3. Pp: 75-88 - Rezayie dash arzhane, M. (2014). An Introduction To The Link Between Babr-e Bayān And The Kunya Of Sagazi In Shahnameh. Lorestan Journal of Heroic Literature. 1st year. No. 2. Pp: 47-72 ریخت‌شناسی داستان پهلوانببربیان مطابق با نظریه‌ی ولادیمیر پراپ علیرضا تابان‌مهر (طالبان)* محمدهادی خالق‌زاده ** مهدی فاموری*** چکیده امروزه در نقد ادبی با شناخت سازهها و گزارههای یک اثر میتوان با ساختار آن آشنا شد. یکی از شاخههای نقد ادبی، با تکیه بر عناصر سازنده‌ی اثر، روایتشناسی است. نظریهپردازان بزرگی در زمینه‌ی روایتشناسی کار کرده و نظریات بسیار مهمی را ارائه داده‌اند. بهترین شیوه‌ی تحلیل و دستهبندی ساختاری در داستانها و قصههای اساطیری و حماسی، در ریختشناسی ولادیمیر پراپ (Vladimir Propp) میتوان یافت. تحلیل رمزگانی پراپ به شناختی بایسته از سازههای روایات حماسی یاری میرساند. سی‌ویک خویشکاری و شخصیتهای هفتگانی ریختشناسی پراپ سبب میشود حرکتهای تعادل، قهر و بحران و تعادل نهایی در روایت حماسی دریافت شود. در این مقاله‌ی تحلیلی-توصیفی سعی بر این شده است ساختار حماسه‌ی منظوم ببربیان که از سراینده‌ای نامعلـوم اسـت، با الهـام از نظریـه‌ی ولادیمیر پراپ روسـی بررســی شود. منظومه‌ی ببربیان که سده سرایش آن را پیش از عهد مغول و در حدود قرن ششم دانستهاند، در 477 بیت با دادخواهی گروهی از دادخواهان هندی آغاز میشود و با کشته‌شدن ببربیان توسط رستم و ازدواج او با دختر رای هند به پایان میرسد. نتایج این تحلیل حاکی از این است که میتوان الگوی خویشکاریهای مدنظر پراپ را در این روایت حماسی- اسطورهای دریافت و با نمودگاری حرکتهای اصلی که در بطن خود حرکتهای فرعی قرار داده، این نظریه انطباق داده شود. در نمودگاری ریختشناسانه این روایت، سی‌ویک خویشکاری مدنظر پراپ در قصهها، هرچند به‌صورت غیرمتوالی یافت شد. وجود هر هفت شخصیت روایتشناسی پراپ در این منظومه نشانگر همسانی و همگونی این حماسه با روایتهای مدنظر پراپ است. بسط روایت در این منظومه ازطریق خویشکاری «کشمکش- پیروزی» انجام شده است. واژه‌های کلیدی: روایتشناسی، ریختشناسی، ساختارگرایی، منظومه‌ی ببربیان، ولادیمیر پراپ. * دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد یاسوج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یاسوج، ایران monajatname@gmail.com ** استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران asatirpars@gmail.com (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) *** استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران mehdifamoori@gmail.com تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 22/3/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 7/7/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6341_c16aced5a6e23f45c49010519403f580.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 The rise and fall of storytelling in the poems of Simin Behbahani and Jaleh Esfahani. اوج و فرود داستان‌وارگی در شعر ژاله اصفهانی و سیمین بهبهانی 59 88 6534 10.22099/jba.2022.41941.4137 FA مریم سادات دستغیب دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه قم لیلا پژوهنده دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه قم Journal Article 2021 10 09 The rise and fall of storytelling in the poems of Simin Behbahani and Jaleh Esfahani. Introduction: In Iran, poetry and narrative poetry have a history from pre-Islamic times.In the Islamic period, narrative poetry was popular almost from the beginning of Dari poetry. In the contemporary period, the distance between narration and poetry has become very small, and this feature is very evident in the poems of some contemporary poets. It can be said that the movement of contemporary poetry is towards the structure of fiction; In other words, in addition to poetic elements such as imagination, music and image, poetry also has narrative elements such as character, dialogue, time, place and scene in its structure, and the frequency of these elements is such that this category of poems can be called narrative poetry. Among the differences between narration in poetry and fictional narration, we can mention the shortness of poetic narratives, the generality of narration in poetry, and the neglect of details and the one-dimensionality of the characters. Research method and theoretical foundation: Fictional elements under the headings of narration, narration, narrative elements or narrative in the poetry of some contemporary poets such as Mohammad Reza Shafiee, Kadkani, Qaisar Aminpour, Mehdi Akhavaneshal, Forough Farrokhzad and Tahereh Saffarzadeh have been studied separately or comparatively and in whole or in part.Here are some examples of dissertations related to the topic:A Comparative Study of Narrative Elements in a Barren Land and Believing in the Beginning of the Cold Season, (2015) by Amir Afshar; Structure and form of narration of Forough Farrokhzad's poems, (2012) by Elham Hajian; Storytelling in the works of Mehdi Akhavan Sales (2011) by Ramin Zaboli; A study of the narrative element in the poem of Qaisar Aminpour (2016) by Ameneh Hosseinpour. The closest work to the present study is the dissertation on the evolution of storytelling in contemporary lyric poetry (2015), the beautiful work of Safarpourchafi. In this dissertation, first the narrative lyric and the story lyric have been studied in general and then the narrative elements in the lyric poems of Simin Behbahani and Hossein Manzavi have been studied in two separate sections. Simin Behbahani's narrative poems are discussed briefly in this dissertation and only a few examples of Simin's narrative poems are mentioned. The statistical population of the present study has been extracted and provided from all their poetry books. The present applied research, effective narrative elements in the process of narration, story creation and poetry: dialogue, perspective, characterization, theme and format in the poetry of two contemporary female poets: Jaleh Esfahani and Simin Behbahani study in a descriptive-analytical manner and in some cases use statistical analysis, tables and graphs. The statistical population of the study is 70 narrative poems by Simin Behbahani and 37 fiction poems by Jaleh Esfahani which have been extracted and provided from all their poetry books. The method of data collection in this research is the library method and the data collection tool is phishing. Then, the techniques and methods of storytelling in the works of both poets are examined in a comparative way to determine the similarities and differences in the use of fictional elements in the poetry of Jaleh Esfahani and Simin Behbahani. Discussion: This study intends to study the use of important and influential narrative elements in the narrative process in the poetry of two prominent and contemporary female poets: Jaleh Esfahani (1300-1368) and Simin Behbahani (1306-1393) and shows that they have narrative elements such as characterization, How and with what characteristics have they used dialogue, description, atmosphere, time, place, scene, etc. in their poetry, and what themes have they mainly dealt with in their narrative poems. A comparison is then made between the two poets to show which of these poets has used the narrative method the most in their poems; In which works are the techniques and methods of storytelling richer and what are the similarities and differences between the quality of using narrative elements in the poetry of these poets. The focus of the research is on the relationship between storytelling and poetry in the narrative poems of two poets. Considering the influence of women's poetry in the field of contemporary poetry and the prevalence of storytelling and narration in various poetic formats by contemporary poets and the history of application of this artistic method in classical literature, this type of research in addition to showing the evolution of contemporary poetry, scientific standards and It provides valuable art for the critique of poetry today and provides a broader and more diverse context for research in the field of fiction and narrative literature. Considering the importance and position of Jaleh Esfahani and Simin Behbahani in the history of contemporary women's poetry, it is important to study the fictional elements in the poetry of these poets. Conclusion: Despite the similarities in the narrative poems of these two poets from the perspective of fictional elements, we conclude that in the narrative poems of Jaleh Esfahani, sometimes the expression of narrative in poetry has damaged the structure of the poem and reduced its poetic features. In fact, in Jaleh Esfahani's poems, narrative features have surpassed poetic features and have reduced the imagination, feeling and poetic nature of the poems, and the poems adhere more to the rules of the story than poetry; In the sense that the poet wants to include a story in the form of a poem and tell it to his audience in a melodic expression. In Simin Behbahani's poems, the narration of the story has not damaged the structure of the poem and has not diminished the poetic nature of the poems, and it is this narration and story that has served the poetry. In other words, poetry has approached narration and story by preserving the rules and regulations of poetry. According to the examples of Simin Behbahani's narrative poems that were mentioned and according to the characteristics that we mentioned for these poems, it can be said that Simin Behbahani has established the link between poetry and story in the best way in her poems. Expresses important issues and problems in the form of poetry, using narrative elements in such a way that the audience does not reject the poem, but quite the opposite; Follow and remember the poem with interest. Finally, we can borrow from the sentence of Mehdi Akhavan Sales about his own narrative poems and point out that: Simin Behbahani has raised the narrative to the level of poetry and in some cases Jaleh Esfahani has reduced the poem to the level of narration. Keywords: Storytelling, Jaleh Esfahani, Simin Behbahani, Narrative Poetry, Fictional Elements. Resources: Isfahani, Jaleh. 2016. Collection of poems, Tehran: Negah. Okhovat, A. 1992. Grammar of the story, Isfahan: Tomorrow. Afshar, A. A comparative study of the elements of narrative in a barren land and believe in the beginning of the cold season. Master Thesis in Dramatic Literature. Tehran University of Arts. Behbahani, Simin 2005. Collection of Poems, Tehran: Negah. Peshab, L. 2004. Lessons on Story Writing, Translator: Mohsen Soleimani, Third Edition, Tehran: Surah Todorov, T. 1388. Poetics of New Studies in Prose, Narrated by Anoushirvan Ganjipour, Tehran: Published. Haji Aghababaei, M. Salehi, N. ۱۳۹۷. "Study of the elements of narration in the poetry of the eighth reader and the puppet of the Third Brotherhood." Journal of Poetry Research, No. 35: 45-68 Shadrooi Manesh, M. Bramki, A. ۱۳۹۱. Hajian. Structure and form of narration of Forough Farrokhzad's poems. Bachelor's thesis in Persian language and literature. Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Kurdistan. HoseinPuor. A. study of the narrative element in the poetry of Qaisar Aminpour. Faculty of Humanities, Semnan University. Khafaji, Baadelmonem . 1985. Arabic Literature Hadith. Cairo: Al-Azhariyah General Library. Rezaian, b. A Comparative Study of Narration and Narration in Ferdowsi Shahnameh and the Works of Mehdi Akhavan Sales. Bachelor Thesis in Persian Language and Literature. Faculty of Literature, Zabol University. Rouhani, Reza. Mansoori, Ahmad Reza 2007. Narrative lyric and its origin in Persian poetry. Journal of Persian Language and Literature Research. spring and summer. No. 8. 105 -121. Zaboli, R. Storytelling in the works of Mehdi Akhavan Sales. Master Thesis in Persian Language and Literature. University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Sarikhani, N. A study of the narrative structure in the poems of Mohammad Reza Shafiee, Kadkani (based on the second millennium of mountain deer and in the alleys of Neishabour gardens). Bachelor's thesis in Persian language and literature. Islamic Azad University of Shiraz. Soleimani, M. 1991. The art of storytelling, Tehran: Amir Kabir. Shadravi Manesh, Mohammad. Bramki, Azam. 1391. "Narrative tricks in the narrative poems of Mehdi Akhavan Sales." Journal of Persian Literature, No. 10: 83 to 102. Sharifi Valdani, Gh. Heydari, P. ۱۳۹۲. "Study of narrative elements in Nima's poem" Soldier Family "." Journal of Fiction Literature, No. 4: 41-58. Safarpour Chafi, Z. A study of the evolution of storytelling in contemporary lyric poetry. Master's thesis in Persian language and literature. Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan. Kakhi ,M . 1992. The Voice of Awakened Wonder, Interviews by Mehdi Akhavan Sales / M. Omid Tehran: Winter. Martin, v. 2003. Theories of Narration, Translator: Mohammad Shahba, Tehran: Hermes. Mastoor, M. 2000. Basics of Short Story, Tehran: Center. Mirsadeghi, J. 1394. Elements of the story, ninth edition, Tehran: Sokhan. Mirsadeghi, J. 1985. Elements of the story, Tehran: Shafa. Milani, F. 2004. "A Fist Full of Simin Behbahani's Life Stars and Poems" Simin Behbahani's Festival by Ali Dehbashi, Tehran: Negah. Nazarian, A. Investigating the elements of the story in Tahereh Saffarzadeh's book Bitter Links. Master Thesis. University of Lorestan. اوج و فرود داستان‌‌ وارگی در شعر ژاله اصفهانی و سیمین بهبهانی مریم‌سادات دستغیب * لیلا پژوهنده** چکیده در ایران منظومه‌‌سرایی و شعر روایی از روزگار پیش از اسلام سابقه دارد. با توجه به میزان اثرگذاری زنان در عرصه‌ی شعر معاصر و حرکت شعر معاصر به‌سمت ساختار داستانی در قالب‌های مختلف، این پژوهش کاربرد عناصر داستانی را در شعر ژاله اصفهانی و سیمین بهبهانی به‌شیوه‌ی توصیفی – تحلیلی بررسی کرده و چگونگی کاربرد این عناصر و نسبت روایت با شاعرانگی را در شعر آنان نشان داده و پس از آن، شباهت‌ها و تفاوت‌های داستانپردازی را در آثار شاعران به‌شیوه‌ی تطبیقی و تحلیل آمار، موردبررسی قرار داده است. تحلیل آماری شواهد شعری، جدول‌ها و نمودارهای عناصر داستانی و یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد با وجود داشتن شباهت، اما تفاوت‌های بنیادی در کاربرد عناصر داستانی دیده می‌شود. در اشعار ژاله، گاه روایت داستان به ساختار شعر آسیب رسانده و جنبه‌ی داستانی بر ویژگی شعری پیشی گرفته و از تخیل و شاعرانگی شعر کاسته است، در مقابل روایت‌های سیمین به شیوه‌ای نو و خلاقانه سروده شده‌اند. می‌توان گفت سیمین بهبهانی روایت را به‌حد شعر اوج و ژاله اصفهانی در مواردی شعر را به‌حد روایت تنزل داده است. واژه‌های کلیدی: داستان‌وارگی، ژاله اصفهانی، سیمین بهبهانی، شعر روایی، عناصر داستانی. * دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه قم maryamdastgeib@gmail.com ** دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه قم leila.pazhoohandeh@gmail.com (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 17/7/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 12/11/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6534_a21403f88d2fde81503a18c88a042b8e.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 The Tradition of Reading Ruba'i among Iranians گسترة سنت رباعی خوانی مردمی در ایران 89 110 6479 10.22099/jba.2021.41035.4071 FA حسن ذوالفقاری استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس Journal Article 2021 06 21 The Tradition of Reading Ruba'i among Iranians Introduction In books on rhetoric, Ruba'is are mostly considered as formal, and by its name account, a foreign type of poetry, while it is one of the oldest forms of Farsi poetry. Ruba'i is a descendent of Pahlavi language in Iran's pre-Islamic era, the dialectical versions of which could be observed in some texts. Besides the theoretical debates on the form and content of Ruba'i, it is important to study its function and style of reading among people. This study is to investigate the idea that Ruba'i was common among people and should not be considered as a classic form. No evidence except Pahlavi texts are given to suppose this idea. This study, however, performed a field study on 14 types of Ruba'is with their customary functions in different areas of Iran. The results indicate that Ruba'is were common among people of Iran, singing it in their happy and sad ceremonies. Reading Ruba'is has been prevalent in different areas of Iran which is different from the formal and classic Ruba'is. Public Ruba'i has tremolo and additions; it is compatible with the language and dialect of the area; it is sometimes accompanied with music; it is often performed customarily in wedding or mourning ceremonies. Reading Ruba'is is sometimes performed through dance and games; the poems often do not have the title of Ruba'i and they do not have any particular poet. In fact, they take a title in each area. These titles are mostly the changed and manipulated versions of Ruba'is such as Rabayi, Ravayi, and Rabahi, meaning that they follow the content. The poems are simple and without much literary devices, carrying themes of daily life, while the classic Ruba'i often has a mystic and philosophical meaning. Review of the literature, aims, and research method There have been many studies on Ruba'is in classic literature. However, few have attempted to investigate reading Ruba'is and their function among people. To show the prevalence of this literary form among people, Zolfaqari (2015) conducted a field study on 600 types of folk poems which were considered Ruba'i. The comparison and analysis of their structure revealed the following results. The tradition of reading Ruba'i in Iran Reading Ruba'i and couplet is the basic of musical songs of southern and central Khorasan. The common songs in Khorasan and Tajikistan in the form of Ruba'i are known as Gharibi which shows the sorrows of a Tajik. Gharibis were also sung in Iran and Afqanistan. They were sometimes known as quatrain in the Northern Khorasan (Yousefzadeh, 2009, p. 143), differentiating between their own quatrains and those of the other areas, considering them regional or foreign. Reading Falak (heaven) is a complaint poem about the destructive events of the world in Khorasan. In the Ruba'is of Falak, Falak is the destiny of the human, thus, the poet complains about the unkind behavior of Falak. Ravayi or Ruba'i is a type of happy poetry in Dameghan which were sung by ladies in wedding ceremonies. They are not accompanied by music, and their content is about the bride and groom. In Sistan, the feminine mourning ceremonies are known as Ravayi, or Ardeh (shouting). They are sung in group or individually without any musical instrument. In the desert area of Dameghan, the epic and heroic poems are sometimes sung as Ruba'i, and ladies read Ruba'i in wedding and groom (Damad Sadkani) ceremonies. Marvegi is a type of happy songs and musical instrument in Marv city which is sung in wedding and happy ceremonies. It is actually a public Ruba'i taken from Bukhara. In the north of Iran, Ruba'i or Tabari Khaun/Tabari Khan is a type of poem in Mazandarani dialect which is sung in Tirgan or Tirmasinzeh ceremonies. In the south of Iran, particularly in Abadeh city, when families take the bride to the groom's house, they sing some poems which are known as Rabahi. Reading Khayam, or Khayami or Shaki is a type of music in Bushehr city which is performed in the wedding, circumcising, and other happy ceremonies. References Ahmadi Panah Semnani, M. (1998). The music of the neighbor. Journal of Poetry, 23, 116-119. Ahmadi Panah Semnani, M. (2004). Song and writing songs in Iran. Soroush. Ahmadi Rishehri, A. (1996). Sangestan. Navid Shiraz. Ajami, M. (1997). A research on oral poems of Tajikestan. Journal of Poetry, 21. Akrami, R. (2004). Tirmasinzeh songs. Book of the Month, 67 & 68, 90-93. Amanov, R. (2002). Public Ruba'I and exquisite secrets. Soroush. Amanov, R., & Shadi Gol, O. (1976). Ruba'is of Tajikistan. Erfan. Ameri, J., & Tabatabai, H. (2017). Local music of desert area. Hableh Rood. Babachahi, A. (1989). Shereh in south of Iran. The Cultural Institute of Eghbal. Boostan, B., & Darvishi, M. (1991). A review of traditional and local music of Iran. Artistic Studies. Dolatshah Samarghandi. (1959). On poets (edited by Mohammad Ramezani). Kalaleh Khavar. Fatemi, S. (2014). Ceremony and music in Iranian cultures. Mahoor. Homayi, J. (2000). Intimate secrets. Morvarid. Homayi, J. (2002). Rhetoric techniques and literary devices. Homa Press. Honari, R. (1962). Husbandry among villagers and nomads of Ghuchan. Payam Novin, 4(6). Javid, H. (2007). An introduction to local music in Iran. Sooreh Mehr. Mahdavi, H. (2013). Ceremonies and customs of Iranians. Afkar. Maraghi, A. (1993). Community of languages. Institute of Research on Culture. Mashayekhi, M. (2009). Culture of people in Tayba and Bakherz. Mohaghegh. Masoomi, N., & Khalov, M. (1965). Folklore of people in Afghanistan in Tajik alphabet. Doshanbeh. Mirafzali, A. (1997). Farsi and Ruba'i. Journal of poetry. 21(4). Mohebi, M. (1961). Book of the week. 41, 861. Nasri Ashrafi, J. (2004). Drama and music in Iran. Aroon. Noorjanov, N. (1999). Traditional theatre of Tajikestan and reminiscent of ancient culture. Journal of Art, 24(4). Ohad al-Din Kermani. (1987). Divan of Rubayat. Soroush. Payandeh Langeroodi, M. (1979). Traditions and customs of Gil and Deylam. Center of Culture. Razavian, F. (1993). Songs and music of locals in southern Khorasan. Received from: http://www.persiancarpetassociation.com Razi, H. (2004). Ceremonies of water. Behjat. Sedaghat Kish, J. (1987). Rubahi in weddings of Abadeh. Chista, 42, 177-183. Shafiee Kadkani, M. (1989). Music of poetry. Agah. Shahrani, E. (1994). Tajik and Pakestanian couplets. Research Center of Farsi Language in Iran and Pakistan. Shamisa, S. (1984). A review of Ruba'i in Farsi poetry. Tehran. Shams Gheis Razi. (1981). On the poems of foreigners (edited by Mohammad Ghazvini). Zavar. Shariatzadeh, A. (1992). The culture of Shahroodi people. Pazineh. Sharifian, M. (2003). About mourning, music, and custom of mourning in Bushehr. Dirin. Sharifian, M., & Nasrashrafi, J. (2009). The lyrics of Khayami album. Mahoor. Tabatabayifar, R. (2002). Ghatool village during the history: a monography. Naghsh Bayan. Taheria, M. (1965). A history of Dameghan culture and a selection of Dameghan's folk cultures. Magazine of Education Organization in Dameghan. Vahidian Kamiar, T. (1978). Analyzing the rhyme of folk poetry. Agah. Vahidian Kamiar, T. (1991). Analyzing the source of rhyme in Farsi poetry. Astan Ghods Razavi. Yousefzadeh, A. (2009). Musicians of northern Khorasan and its repertoire (translated into Farsi by Alireza Manafzadeh). Mahoor. Zarinkoob, A. (1978). Unveiled poetry and non-lying poetry. Javidan. Zolfaqar, H. (2015). Functions and features of couplet in Iranian songs. Literary Studies, 9(32), 63-95. Zolfaqari, H. (2015). Folk poetry literature. Institute of Supporting National Researchers. گستره‌ی سنت رباعی خوانی مردمی در ایران حسن ذوالفقاری چکیده رباعی از مهم‌ترین و قدیم‌ترین قالب‌های شعر فارسی است. این قالب مشهور جز آنکه در شعر کلاسیک جایگاه ویژه‌ای دارد و شاعران بزرگی چون خیام را به خود جذب کرده است، میان مردم نیز بسیار رواج دارد. در مناطق مختلف و اقوام گوناگون با نام‌ها و کارکردهای متفاوت در آیین‌ها و مراسم سوگ و سرور خوانده می‌شود و خنیاگران محلی آن را با ساز و آواز می‌نوازند و می‌خوانند. رباعی‌های مردمی ویژگی‌هایی دارد که آن را از نوع کلاسیک آن متمایز می‌کند. روش مطالعه‌ی بررسی موردی و براساس طرحی جامع باعنوان «بومی سرودهای ایرانی» انجام شده که تمامی گونه‌های شعری را شناسایی می‌کند. در این پژوهش 14گونه رباعی در مناطق مختلف ایران و کشورهای فارسی زبان شناسایی شد که به گویش محلی بود. این گونه‌های بومی رباعی در شرق ایران با نام‌های «روایی»، «چهاربیتی»، «غریبی»، «باخرزی»، «ارده‌خوانی»، «فلک‏خوانی»، «موریگی»، «ارده»، «ربّایی» و در شمال ایران باعنوان «ربایی خئون» و «امیری» و در جنوب ایران به «رباهی»، «داربازی» و «خیام-خوانی» شهرت دارد. بیشترین کاربرد رباعی در خراسان بزرگ است. این مقاله برای نخستین بار این گونه‌ی مهم را معرفی می‌کند. واژه‌های کلیدی: ادبیات عامه، رباعی‌خوانی، گونه‌های رباعی‌خوانی، نام‌های رباعی.

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6479_1209e27409e59a345ead91fa0990178e.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 Attar and Meeting with Holy witness (A discussion on the Construction and Content of some of sonnet-narrations of Attar’s Divan) عطار و دیدار با شاهد قدسی (بررسی ساخت و محتوای برخی از غزل-روایتهای دیوان عطار) 111 136 6533 10.22099/jba.2022.41885.4134 FA احمد سنچولی دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه زابل Journal Article 2021 10 03 Attar and Meeting with Holy witness (A discussion on the Construction and Content of some of sonnet-narrations of Attar’s Divan) Introduction Attar (537-627 AH) is one of the most prominent poets of the great mystical school who has the most subtle and refreshing spiritual thoughts and the most beautiful spiritual experiences in the field of mystical worldview has left. In many of his sonnets, a kind of story or event is depicted that expresses the sudden spiritual transformation of a mystic or a seeker of the path. Among his sonnets, which include 872 sonnets, about 70 sonnets have a special and different structure from the rest of the sonnets. In these lyric poems, which express a kind of intuitive experience and are considered as the randan and bullying lyric poems, almost the same situation occurs on Attar or his elder. This state, which is a kind of mystical event and a personal and inner perception, is "the expression of a spiritual experience that implicitly refers to the attainment of unmediated knowledge of the senses and intellect, and requires the creation of special psychological conditions resulting from asceticism and austerity." (Pournamdarian, 1390: 17). Although such a theme can be deduced in most of his sonnets along with other themes of his poetry, but in these few sonnets, they have their own construction and function. Research method, background and purpose The research method is descriptive-analytical and the purpose of conducting it is to study and analyze those of Attar's sonnets in which the experience of his meeting with a holy witness is depicted. Regarding the researches related to the subject of meeting oneself, one can mention the works of Poornamdarian who have spoken about this subject in detail; In his book Mysteries and Mysterious Stories, he traces the history of such experiences even to pre-Islamic works. In the book Meeting with Simorgh, he describes the spiritual events and the dreams of mystics. He has also dedicated a part of the book in the shadow of the sun to the subject of commands, speech and experiences of mystics in this field, and subsequently to the aspects contrary to the habit and revelation of Molana's sonnets. Taheri (2003) studied the structure and mutual relations of various units and elements in 27 lyric poems narrated by Attar based on the combination of two chain and vertical structural methods (axis of companionship and succession) and he was the originator of this type of lyric poems in Persian literature. Discussion The manifestation of the beloved in one of its infinite forms is among the spiritual experiences which, in Jung's words, is "a psychological knowledge whose contents originate from the unconscious" (Pournamdarian, 1390: 152; quoted by: Jung, 223). This mystical knowledge, which is a spiritual or psychological experience, is obtained as a result of finding a special spiritual space that requires austerity, enduring hunger and thirst, leaving the world and giving up carnality and the like. Such knowledge is born of personal memory and experiences of the type of dreams and dreams that the speaker is not aware of in order to overcome the emotions and emotions that result from it. In such a process of writing, the speaker speaks of the nature of experience and meeting and observing. The predominant aspect of these lyric poems is "emotional passion" and writing meanings and taste experiences that originate from the poet's mentality. Since in most of these sonnets the time of the event is night and especially at dawn, it can be seen that these sonnets are born of a personal experience and inner perception and the narrator is immersed in an intuitive experience (event). , Is a dream) and speaks of the essence of experience and the same meeting. Attar has reported such an experience in many of his joyous sonnets. These poems are more like a dream, because the occurrence of such events in the real world is not very consistent with reality. That a drunken and irrational painter enters the mosque at dawn and on two knees sits in front of the old man and gives him a cup or pain, and the old man under the influence of his words and also under the influence of the painter's beauty or under the influence of a cup or pain that he loses He is drunk, returns from asceticism and religion and turns to infidelity, or ties a rope to the cult of the drunken beauty of Loli, and then reaches the position of discovery and intuition and achieves secrets, is unlikely in the real world. And the possibility of having it as a reality is completely ruled out. Hence, these sonnets "if they are not dreams, they are dreamy and like interpretation, they need to be interpreted; interpretation that is derived from the possessions of the poet's mind "(Pournamdarian, 1390: 146). Conclusion The issue of meeting the holy witness is one of the important issues that is reflected in Attar's lyric poems more than other mystic poets. In a significant part of his sonnets, Attar has tried to present a report of his spiritual experiences and emotional emotions to the audience in a simple and intimate language. In these sonnets, the semantic background of which is determined by the story of Sheikh Sanan and Hallaj, the beloved, who has absolute power, appears to him in a body of violence and beauty. Due to the predominance of emotional states, the poet clings to metaphorical language and uses codes and symbols that often play on the institutionalized signs of the Sufi linguistic community. Hence, the circle of the possibility of signification of the signs expands and the system of signification and the domain of meaning in them remains open and opens the door of interpretation to itself. Dreaminess, contradiction and ambiguity are the inherent nature of these sonnets. The poet's tone is serious and regrettable in them, and due to the narrator's close connection with the events, the news and emotional aspects prevail in them. Keywords: Meeting with Holy witness; Attar Neishabouri; Sonnets; Personal and intuitive knowledge. Resources Abedi, Mahmoud and Pournamdarian, Taghi. (1390). Introduction to the Mantegho Teir. Tehran: Samat. Adonis (Ali Ahmad Saeed). (1385). Sufism and Surrealism. Translated by Habibollah Abbasi, Tehran: Sokhan. Ansari Heravi, Khawaje Abdullah. (1386). Class of Sufism. Edited by Mohammad Sarvar Molaei, Tehran: Toos. Attar Neyshabouri, Sheikh Farid al-Din Muhammad ibn Ibrahim. (1380). Attar Divan. Edited by Taghi Tafazoli, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. Bresler, Charles. (1386). An Introduction to Theories and Methods of Literary Criticism. Translated by Mostafa Abedinifard, Tehran: Niloufar. Einol Ghozat Hamadani. (1373). Preparations. Edited by Afif Osiran, Tehran: Manouchehri. ___________________. (1377). Letters Einol Ghozat Hamadani. By Alinaghi Monzavi and Afif Osiran, Tehran: Asatir. Emami, Saber. (1382). "Molana and the Archetypes of Jung". Art Quarterly, No. 58, pp. 8-16. Fotoohi, Mahmood. (1389). "From the word of the rich to the word of the defeated." Literary Criticism Quarterly, year 3, Number 10, pp. 35-62. ______________. (2012), Stylistics of Theories, Approaches and Methods, Tehran: Sokhan. Forouzanfar, Badi al-Zaman. (1353). Description and critique of the works of Sheikh Farid al-Din Mohammad Attar Neyshabouri. Tehran: Dehkhoda. Hassanzadeh Mir Ali, Abdullah; Nusrati, Roghayeh (1394). "Formal similarities of surrealist literature in Attar Neyshabouri's lyric poems". Journal of Critical Literature Studies. Year 2, No. 8, pp. 81-97. Hosseini, Maryam (1386). "Fairy in Molana's poetry". Al-Zahra University Humanities Quarterly, 17 and 18, No. 68 and 69, pp. 1-21. _____________. (1388). "A Sufi woman in the dreams of mystics". Journal of Mystical Studies Kashan University, No. 10, pp. 149-172. Jacobsen, Roman. (1380). "Metaphorical and virtual poles". Translated by Kourosh Safavi. Speeches in Linguistics. Tehran: Hermes. Jung, C. G. The collected works. The Archetypes and collective unconscious, second edition, trans, by R. F. C. Hull. Jung, Carl Gustav. (1386). Psychology and religion. Translated by Fouad Rouhani, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. Kahdooi, Mohammad Kazem; Hedayati Shahedi, Akram. (1389). "God in the dreams of mystics". Bi-Quarterly Journal of Mystical Literature, Al-Zahra University, Volume 2, year 3, pp. 93-114. Mohammadi, Ali; Ismailipour, Maryam. (1391). "A comparative study of the archetype of the mask in Jung's views and its traces in Molana's sonnets". Quarterly Journal of Mystical Literature and Mythology, year 8, Number 6, pp. 151-181. Pournamdarian, Taqi. (1367). Mysteries and mystery stories in Persian literature. Tehran: Scientific and cultural. ______________. (1380). In the shade of the sun. Tehran: Sokhan. ______________. (1390). Meet Simorgh. Tehran: Institute of Humanities. Qureishi, Zahra Sadat et al. (1394). "Transition from myth to self in Shams lyric poems". Journal of Mystical Literature Research (Gohar Goya), year 9, Number 1, 28, pp. 1-34. Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza. (1378). Persian Zabour. Tehran: Agah. Shamisa, Sirus. (1383). Literary types. Tehran: Ferdows. Shushtari, Judge Noorullah. (1377). Majlis al-Mu'minin. Tehran: Islamieh. Taheri, Godratollah. (1382). "Structuralist critique and analysis of Attar's lyric poems." Culture, Nos. 46 and 47, pp. 191-215. عطار و دیدار با شاهد قدسی (بررسی ساخت و محتوای برخی از غزل-روایتهای دیوان عطار) احمد سنچولی* چکیده عطار نیشابوری در بخش قابل‌توجهی از غزلهای رندانه و شورانگیز خود، به موضوع دیدار با شاهد قدسی یا منِ برتر و ملکوتی خویش پرداخته است. او در این غزلها، واقعهای را به تصویر کشیده که به‌نوعی معرفت درونی، شهودی و کاملاً شخصی بیمیانجی حسّ و عقل اشاره دارد؛ به همین سبب، از زبان، نگرش، سبک و سیاق خاصی برخوردارند و فردیت و خلاقیت شاعر در آنها به‌خوبی نمایان است. عطار در این دسته از غزلها که ساختاری داستانگونه و کاملاً روایی دارند و میتوان آنها را غزل-داستان نامید، راوی قصههای حوادث روحی خویش است؛حوادثی که بنمایهی اصلی آنها را زمینهی معنایی داستان شیخ صنعان و حلاج رقم میزند. به‌دلیل غلبهی احوال عاطفی و شهودی، شاعر به قطب استعاری زبان متوسل می‌شود و برای بیان منظور خویش از رمز و نماد بهره میگیرد. رؤیاگونگی، تناقض و ابهام سرشت ذاتی این غزلها به حساب میآید و به همین دلیل، باب تأویل را به روی خویش میگشاید. همچنین غلبهی وجه اخباری و عاطفی، لحن جدی و حسرتآمیز شاعر و نیز تناسب صورت و محتوا را میتوان از دیگر مختصات این دسته از غزلها برشمرد. واژه‌های کلیدی: دیدار با شاهد قدسی(منِ ملکوتی)، عطار نیشابوری، غزلیات، معرفت شخصی و شهودی. * دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه زابل ah_sanchooli@uoz.ac.ir تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 11/7/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 17/11/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6533_db706256e15b82c14075a21a059f8d6b.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 Analysis and Comparison of the Function of Husserl’s Phenomenology in Yadollah Royai’s Theories and Image Poetry تحلیل و مقایسه‌ی کارکرد پدیدارشناسی هوسرلی در نظریات و بوطیقای تصویر شعر یدالله رؤیایی 137 166 6524 10.22099/jba.2022.41864.4133 FA عادل سواعدی گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران. محمد رضا صالحی مازندرانی زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران مریم رفیع گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران. Journal Article 2021 10 01 Introduction Spacement poetry has proved its situation in contemporary Iranian poetry after publishing it’s manifest in winter of 1348. Yadollah Royai, the prominent figure of this stream has also tried during time to practice it's different lingual, philosophical and aesthetic bases. This approach has always been a Subject for debate, for its own ambiguity in manifest and theorical discussions. One of the reasons for this ambiguity is the effect of Husserl’s phenomenonlogical philosophy. After publishing its manifest, Royai has confirmed this impact. Accordingly studies show that there is a deep correlation between spacement poetry and phenomenology. phenomenonlogical concepts such as superior I, Epoche, phenomena, conscious expriences and so on are easy to be understood when the poet has used them. in his ideas, in form of suspicions Dekartic I, putting preassumptions in paranthesis, imagining a supernatural world, the audience creations in conference with spacement imagination mechanism and the like these themes and concepts have been used in Royai’s ideas and have been effective in the connection between spacement poetry and Husserl’s phenomenology, ambiguities, And the complications of the manifest and the poets ideas. Research method, History and the Research purpose This research has followed liberary method in which the writers have read the references and have taken notes and use them in there essay. the most important references could help the writers include: “from epoche to poetic innovations: pathology of using phenomenological approach in Literary studies in Persian Language”, ”the hidden face of the Word”, ”the phenomenology of a spacement”, “the poetic of spacement poetry who is Yadollah Royai and what does he say?”, “the poem of our time/12”, “explanation of the margin”, “the contemporary streams of Persian poetry”, “unseen mases”. “Deconstruction in spacement poetry”, “theorical bases of spacement poetry and Royai’s Labrikhteha”, “A study on the form and the Content of a spacement poetry with some interpreations”, “spacement poetry stream”, “a study on Yadollah Royai’s works according to spacement poetry manifest”. Considering philosophical bases of spacement poetry, the writers aim to understand, analyze and compare between the connections, structures, and Husserl’s phenomenological similarities and spacement phenomenology and ultimately illustrate it's practical function in the poetic of image in spacement poetry. Accordingly, they have examined the following two fundamental questions: first, the howness Obvious separation of Poetic theory of spacement and Husserl’s phenomenology and second, the howness of its function in the poetic of images in Yadollah Royai’s poetry. Discussion Without understanding Husserl’s phenomenology, It is not possible to understand the different phenomenological levels of spacement and it’s imagination mechanism. Therefore, what is important is to achieve a relationship between these two issues, leaded to an ambigous action. Here, Royai writes about "arriving to some instant causeless understanding and of a degree Of the absolute that cannot be passed" (Royai, 1396: 89). This illustrates a technical aspect of supreme retation of Husserl's philosophy. He discusses the being Dekart “I” in paranthesis and he changes the famous sentence of Dekart "I think, so I am" into "I think, so it does not exist". This way he not only expresses new poetic thoughts of fundamental concepts of Husserl's phenomenology, but also he approaches the Husserl's transcendental Ego. Also, He continues that the poetic of spacement poetry seperates that super man from the world and it's phenomena. The poet creates images in epoche and he wants to destruct the paranthesis and its content, but this imagination can somehow be suitable with some images of conscious experiences, such as imagination, tendency and so on. He also approaches some other Husserl's phenomenological concepts, for example, in explaining the distances, the texture of images of spacement poetry and the audiences Creations in encounter with the spacement imagination mechanism and ultimately arriving to a fundamental unity of various experiences. So, in the Vast field of scepticism of the spacement phenomenology, in striking Husserl's philosophical system, the expanded bases of this rivival and the independant identity are last. In Royai's thoughts, the audience always faces Husserl's philosophy and a statements and when it comes to comparison, he will find out more similarities between a spacement poetry and Husserl's philosophy. Here is an example of Husserl’s phenomenological function in a piece of poem: 59) A tree with some crazy branches and the echo leaves on the body of the mountain morality of protecting flower in a garden (Royai, 1387: 520) In this poem the reader understands both the mental education of the spacement and an absolute concrete experience, which enters him in the spacement imagination mechanism and finally he discovers the morality of protecting flower in a garden, as he has imagined. So, the circle of this giving meaning takes place in the absolute experiences of I and finally it makes the phenomenological experiences objective. Cnclusion This research showed that the basis of the separation of spacement poetry and phenomenological bases is ambigious. The similarities between spacement poetry and phenomenology are so much that this kind of poetry cannot be separated from Husserl’s phenomenology. Language is one of the reasons for this issue, since it can be stated that one of the responsibilities of language in spacement poetry is making capacities for carrying Husserl’s phenomenological concepts. Therefore, despite the poet’s ideas and the various discussions, this aspect of the spacement poetry could not compensate its defects. In addition, considering the similarities between these two, a phenomenological analysis has been directly made via some poems of Yadollah Royai. It was observed that these poems are connected with Husserl’s phenomenology from spacement imagination, mental education of spacement and spacement images points of view. These poems also show the poet’s viewpoint, expression, semantic originality metaphysical concerns in concepts like supreme, distance, epoche and so on. Key words: Husserl's phenomenology, spacement poetry, Yadollah Royai, poetic theory, poetic imagination, Image poetry, manifest, epoche. References Abasnejad, Farhad and Alavi, Faride (1390): "Yadollah Royai's spacement, the poetic of image and the cognition", Ghalam, N.13, p.p. 89-99. Amarati Moghaddam, Davood (1396):"From Epoche to poetic innovations, the pathology of using phenomenological method in literary researches of Persian Language" ,Literary criticism, N.38, p.p. 171-212. Anvari, Hasan (1382): "graet dictionary of sokhan": v.2, 2nd publish, Tehran, Sokhan. Beiranvand, Ahmad (1393): "The poetic of Spacement poetry/ Who is Yadollah Royai and What did he do?" V.2, Tehran, Afraz. _____ (1395): "The explanation of margin", 2nd publish, Tehran, Rozegar. Fatemi, Seyed Hosein and Amarati Moghadam, Davood (1389):"Spacement and Cubism", Literary Criticism, 3rd year, N.9, p.p. 29-48. Gholamhosein Zade, Gholamhosein et al (1389):" A critical study on spacement poetry based on Narration study of Yadollah Royai Poem", Persian Language and Literature, N.21, p.p. 181-206. Gholami, Alinejat (1398):"An Introduction on phenomenology", 1st publish, Tehran, Pegah Rozegar Now. Hasanli, kavoos (1386): "Different innovations in contemporary Poem of Iran", 2nd publish, Tehran, Sales. Hoseini, Ali (1395): "A study on the form and content of spacement poetry with some analysis", Master's Degree, Humanities Collage, Gilan University. Malekiyan, kamal and Najafi, Eisa (1399):"The Epistmology of Love in Mowlawi Mysticism, an analysis based on Husserl's phenomenology, Heidegger and Merleau Ponty" philosophy and Theology, 25th year, N. l (p. 97), p.p. 8-32. Mirshakak, Azade (1385):" A study on Yadollah Royai's works based on the manifest of spacement poetry", Master's degree, Humanities Collage, Research organization of Humanities and Cultured studies. Mohammadi Nasab, Somaye (1393):"A study on the postmodern features in Poem of Reza Barahani, Ali Babachahi and Yadollah Royai", Master's Degree, Humanities collage, Valiasr university, Rafsanjan. Norbishe Ghadimi, Mohsen (1382):"Deconstruction in Yadollah Royai's Poetry", Master's Degree, Humanities Collage, Gilan University. Rahimi, Marzie (1391): "The role of literary theories in creating literary works, based on thought and ideas of Yadollah Royai, Master's degree, Humanities Collage, Zanjan university. Rashidain, Abdolkarim (1382): " Husserl and phenomenology", Monthly book of Literature and philosophy , N. 82, p.p. 28- 39. Royai, Mozaffar (1385): "Theorical bases of spacement poetry and Royai's Labrikhteha, Baya juornal, N. 41, p.p 58- 84. Royai, Sina (2/2/1397): "The ontology of Yadollah Royai's 70 Gravestone", personal site, Leila Sadeghi. http://leilasadeghi.com/others-works/others-critic-works/612-royayee-8 Royai, Yadollah (1387): "From the red platform", By Habibollah Royai, 1st publish, Tehran, Morvarid. ____ ( 1393): "what is it?", 2nd publish, Tehran, Negah. ____ (1379): "70 Gravestone", 1st publish, Gorgan, Ajine. ____ (1387): "Poem collection", 1st publish, Tehran, Negah. ____ (1392): "looking for that lonely word", 2nd piblish, Tehran, Negah. ____ (1396): "The hidden face of the word", 2nd publish, Tehran, Negah. ____ (1397):" Phenomenology of Spacement, Mashr Publication (Dirrect publish of the book). Sayar, Homa (1372): "Labrikhteha, another more poem", Iranshenasi, N. 20, p.p. 777-787. Schutz, Alfred: "Some fundamental concepts of phenomenology", Teranslated by Yoosef Abazari, Culture (for philosophy), N. 11, (Fall 1371), p.p. 11-32. Shafiee kadkani, mohamadreza (1387): "The period of Persian Poem from the Mashroote to the collapse of the kindom", 5th publish, Tehran, sokhan. _____ ( 1392):" The light and the mirror", 2nd publish, Tehran, Sokhan. Sharifi, Feyz (1393): "The poem of our time/ 12", 1st publish, Tehran, Negah. Shiri, Ghahraman (1388):" The stream of spacement poetry", Humanities Collage (Bahonar Kerman), N. 25, p.p. 73- 91. Shmidt, Richard (1375): "phenomenological Hermenautics/ Husserl's phenomenological transcendental Hermenautics": translated by Zia Movahed, Farhang Journal, N. 18, p.p. 27- 37. Tahayi, Atefe (1385): "Unseen Spacements", Baya Juornal, N. 41, p.p. 89-99. Taslimi, Ali (1395): "Discussions in Contemporary Literature in Iran poetry" , 3rd publish, Tehran, Akhtaran. Woodruff Smith, David (1394):"Husserl", Translated by Mohamadtaghi Shakeri, 1st publish, Tehran, Hekmat. Online Oxford Learners Dictionaries (2020), phenomenology. Address https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/phenomenology?q=phenomenology تحلیل و مقایسه‌ی کارکرد پدیدارشناسی هوسرلی در نظریات و بوطیقای تصویر شعر یدالله رؤیایی عادل سواعدی* محمدرضا صالحی مازندرانی ** مریم رفیع*** چکیده شعر حجم (حجم‌گرایی) یکی از جریان‌های شعری معاصر است که اولین تظاهرات فردی‌اش را در سال‌های 1346 و 1347 در دفتر دلتنگی‌های یدالله رؤیایی و نمک و حرکت ورید پرویز اسلامپور به‌جای گذاشت و سرانجام پس‌ از انتشار بیانیه‌ی آن در زمستان 1348 جایگاه و حرکت گروهی خود را در گفتمان شعری روزگار تثبیت کرد؛ اما متن این بیانیه و نظریه‌ی شعری حجم پیچیدگی‌هایی دارد که هنوز با گذشت سال‌ها مباحث و مناقشاتی پیرامون آن‌ها شکل می‌گیرد. یدالله رؤیایی که چهره‌ی شاخص این جریان است، در طول زمان تلاش کرده است تا با آثار خود به ظرفیت‌های فلسفی، زبانی و زیبایی‌شناسانه‌ی آن عینیت بخشد. از میان این ظرفیت‌ها، پدیدارشناسی هوسرلی از برجسته‌ترین و اثرگذارترین وجوه معرفت‌شناختی بر این نوع از شعر و به‌ویژه اشعار یدالله رؤیایی به ‌شمار می‌آید و خود شاعر نیز مدت‌ها پس‌از انتشار بیانیه‌ی آن بر اثرگذاری این مبنای فلسفی بر شعر حجم صحه گذاشته است. نگارندگان این پژوهش با نظر به این مبنای فلسفی درتلاش‌اند تا با پیش‌فرض وجود چنین تأثیری، به تحلیل و مقایسه‌ی کارکرد آن در نظریات و بوطیقای تصویر شعر یدالله رؤیایی برآیند و به بررسی دو پرسش اساسیِ چگونگی جدایی نظریه‌ی شعر حجم از پدیدارشناسی هوسرلی و چگونگی کارکرد آن بر بوطیقای تصویر شعر این شاعر بپردازند. واژه‌های کلیدی: بوطیقای تصویر، پدیدارشناسی هوسرل، تخیل حجمی، تصویر، یدالله رؤیایی. * استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز a-sawaedi@scu.ac.ir (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) ** دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز salehi_mr20@yahoo.com *** کارشناس ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز rafi.maryam1373@gmail.com تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 14/7/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 12/11/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6524_6eaf2a5f073982ad4ab557e1ed90c543.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 “Innovation in Persian Nimaee Poetry Debates” «شیوه‌های نوآوری در مناظره‌های شعر نیمایی» 167 196 6505 10.22099/jba.2022.41714.4122 FA فاطمه سادات طاهری استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه کاشان مرضیه همتی دانشجوی دکتری گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشکده ادبیات و زبانهای خارجی دانشگاه کاشان. کاشان. ایران Journal Article 2021 09 14 “Innovation in Persian Nimaee Poetry Debates” Introduction The Constitutional Revolution is the most fundamental socio-cultural change that transformed the traditional worldview of Iranians; Therefore, the poets of this period created works appropriate to those conditions because they realized that they should compose the poem for the people that satisfy their political and social feelings. These changes can be seen in various fields of contemporary poetry, including debate. Debate is a literary form in which two people exchange views on moral, political, religious, and legal issues, and usually a third party judges between them. Another form of this debate is Dialogue. Debate was influenced by political, social, cultural, and intellectual developments; as far as its types, themes, forms, and techniques is concerned with Bakhtin's theory, the similarity of the political and social conditions after the constitutional revolution in the Iran with the conditions of the Bakhtin period and Stalin's oppression had a great impact; Therefore, the writers study the aspects innovation in the debates of the debates from 1922 to the Islamic Revolution (1979), with a descriptive-analytical method based on traditional and contemporary Persian debates. they have studied and found the poet has explained part of his method of thought and created a different atmosphere in all these conversations. Background and purpose of the research Some works have been published about debate in Persian poetry; Among them, the following can be mentioned: In the dissertations of Parvin Seyyed Almasi (2010) as "Study of the structure and content of Parvin E'tesami's debates" and Ismail Sharifi (2012) as "Comparison of debate technique in two styles Khorasani and Iraqi"; Mehdi Rahimi (1996) in his treatise entitled "Debate in Persian poetry (from the beginning to Parvin E'tesami)". Narges Mohammadi-Badr and Hashem Mehdizadeh (2016) in the article "Reflections on the evolution of the debate from the Assyrian tree to Nimaee poems"; Ali Akbar Amini (2002) in his article "Dialogue in Contemporary Iranian Poetry"; Mohammad Reza Roozbeh (2013) in the article "Shafi'ei's innovations in the field of debate" and Reza Zarrin-Kemar (2017) in the article "From Debate to Conversation: The Impact of Coup d'etat of 28 August on polyphony in contemporary poetry based on two poems by Akhavan-Sales and the Hushang-e Ebtehaj» ; Vida Sabzevari Beidakhti et al. (2021) in the article "Study of reasoning method in Parvin E'tesami's debates based on Toliman's theory"; But no one of them has dealt with innovative ways of Nimaee debating; However, considering the importance of political and social developments and their direct and indirect impact on the literary works of each period and the place of dialogue and debate in the world and life today, it is necessary to study this issue and discover new ways of debate in contemporary poets. Discussion Contemporary debates, influenced by political and social circumstances, are often written in the form of dialogue. The purpose of the parties to the debate is to weaken and destroy each other; But the purpose of the conversation is to clarify the issue and reach a common ground and accept each other. Start with a question; Existence of rhetorical propositions; Enjoyment of freedom and authority; Intertextual connections with myths and multifaceted actions are components of dialogue that are all seen in contemporary debates. Form of poetry; The role of the poet in poetic narratives; Use of monologue (poet's conversation with himself); Existence of multilateral dialogue; The use of the carnival style and the use of the grotesque are some of the innovations in Nimaee debates that are not found in traditional debates. In traditional debates, the reader pays attention to the text only from the point of view of the poet or narrator; While new debate shows its emotions, it leaves the judgment to the audience; then, in contemporary debates, we are confronted with a kind of hidden narrator who remains silent in order to events to manifest themselves through inner monologue, polyphony, and dialogue. Belonging to the personal world and paying attention to individual feelings draws the poet to the self-talk, and the poet's “you” and “me” is expressed in social pains and the collective "me and you". Traditional debates had lyrical, romantic, and educational content and ignored the social structure of their society; While the contemporary poet, in addition to believing in the connection between the individual and society and their interaction, even pays attention to philosophical concepts. Ancient debates are mostly two-sided; But Contemporary debates are sometimes three- or four-sided. Nimaee debate moves from a state of bilateral conflict to a multi-voiced space with the expansion of the characters present in the poem. Multilateral dialogue can lead to the application of the carnival and grotesque methods of Bakhtin in contemporary debates. The concepts and values that govern society are challenged through the use of carnival and tools such as criticism, satire, irony and ridicule. The components of determining grotesque instances are imperfection and metamorphosis; Exaggeration; It is also called the "grotesque body ", a mixture of conflicting emotions and the human body and related concepts. Contemporary debate uses symbolic character and language, and aesthetic techniques. The atmosphere of ancient debates is based on confrontation and its argument is based on controversy; but Nimaee debates are based on interaction and dialogue. Conclusion Nimaee debates have been written in a new form and structure and express the social and political themes and problems of modern man. Most conversations begin with rhetorical questions and statements that require an audience. The audience is not always a specific person; Rather, it can be the poet's personal or social self. In new debates, dialogue is based on freedom and authority, and neither side is superior to the other; Hence they interact with each other. The poet is usually active in the field of poetry and is not the only narrator. In most cases, debates are formed with the presence of different characters in a narrative atmosphere and create a multi-voiced world. Belonging to the personal world and paying attention to individual feelings sometimes leads the poet to debate in the self-talk. Using the symbolic element, the poet creates symbolic characters and leads the reader to the realm of the multiplicity of poetic meanings and concepts. By creating a carnival atmosphere, he criticizes the political and social situation. The disruption of the values that govern society creates multi-voiced societies with diverse discourses. Keywords: Bakhtin’s Dialogue, Carnival, Grotesque, New Debates, Symbolic Characters. References A'ghdaei, T. (2002). Innovative in Persian poetry. Zanjan: Nikan Ketab. Ahmadi, B. (2000). Text structure and interpretation. Tehran: Markaz Publishing. Akhavan- Sales, M (2003). Then after Thundar (Angah Pas az Thunder). Tehran: Sokhan. Amini, A. (2002), "Dialogue in Contemporary Iranian Poetry", National Studies, Vol. 13, pp. 69-88. Ansari, M. (2006). Dialogue Democracy. Tehran: Markaz Publishing. Arji, A. (2012). "From Narrative Poetry to Poetic Narration", Roshde of Persian Language and Literature, Vol. 97, pp. 34-41. Atashi, M. (1987). Selection of Poetry. Tehran: Morvarid. Bakhtin, M. (2008). Conversational imagination. Tr. by Roya Pourazar. Tehran: Ney Publishing. Braheni, R. (2007). Gold in copper (Tala dar Mes). Tehran: Zaman. Dad, S. (2009). Dictionary of Literary Terms. Tehran: Morvarid. Ebtehaj, H. (2000). Rahi and Ahi. Tehran: Sokhan. Gholam Hosseinzadah, Gh. (2008) Mikhail Bakhtin: Life, Thoughts and Basic Concepts. Tehran: Roozgar No. Hasanli, K. (2005). Types of innovation in contemporary Iranian poetry. Tehran: Sales. Hodhodi, M. (2014). Investigating Saadi's conversations in the Boostan. Tehran: Ketabkhaneh-e Melli. Hosseinpur-e Chafee, A. (2006). Contemporary Persian poetic currents from the coup (1954) to the revolution (1979). Tehran: Amirkabir. Jalili, R. & Mashhur, P. (2017) "Analysis of carnival components in Havay-e Tazeh (Fresh Air) collection by Ahmad Shamloo; "With an approach to Bakhtin's votes." Literary Criticism Studies. No. 46, pp. 69-94. Kazeruni, A. (2009). Research in literary genres. Tehran: Damghan. Khaniki, H. (2009). At the heart of the conversation (Dar Jane Gofteguo). Tehran: Hermes. Knowles, R. (2013). Shakespeare and the Carnival, after the Bakhtin. Translated by Roya Pourazar, Tehran: Hermes. Makarik, I. (2005). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theories. Translated by Mehran Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi. Tehran: Agah. Moshiri, F. (2006). Eternal beauty. Tehran: Sokhan Nima yoshij. A. (1992). Collection of Poems. By Sirus Tahabaz, Tehran: Negah. Pejohandeh, L. (2005) "Philosophy and conditions of dialogue from Rumi's perspective with a comparative view of Bakhtin and Buber's views". Philosophy. No. 77, pp. 11 -34. Pournamdarian, T. (1996). My house is cloudy. Tehran: Morvarid. Razmjoo, H. (2007). Literary types and their works in Persian language. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University. Shamisa, S. (1992). Literary types. Tehran: Bagh-e Ayneh. Shamloo, A. (1994a). Lamentations of soil and blossoming in fog (Marthiyehay-e Khak va Shekoftan-e Meh). Tehran: Zamaneh. Shamloo, A. (1994b). Fresh Air (Havaye Tazeh). Tehran: Negah. Tahmasebi, F. (2015). Sociology of Persian lyric poetry. Tehran: Scientific and cultural. Teodorf, T. (1999). Conversational logic of Mikhail Bakhtin. Translated by Dariush Karimi, Tehran: Matkaz. Tusi, N. (1948). Basics of quotation (Athath al- Eghtebas). Correction by Modarres Razavi, Tehran: University of Tehran. شیوه‌های نوآوری در مناظرههای شعر نیمایی فاطمه‌سادات طاهری * مرضیه همتی** چکیده مناظره، اسلوبی بیانی است که پیشینه‌ی آن به ایران پیش از اسلام برمی‎‎گردد. شاعران هر دوره برای دستیابی به اهدافی که با توجه به ذوق و قریحه‌ی شاعران و جهانبینی رایج در آن دوره تغییریافته، مناظرهسرایی کردهاند. فضای فکری، اجتماعی و سیاسی حاکم بر جامعه‌ی معاصر، تحولات گستردهای در مناظرهسرایی ایجاد کرده است؛ ازاین‌رو نگارندگان با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی و پاسخ به این پرسشهای بنیادی که مناظرههای نیمایی فارسی با مناظرههای سنتی چه تفاوتهایی دارند و این نوآوریها در چه عواملی ریشه دارد؟ استنتاج میکنند: برخلاف مناظرههای سنتی که همواره از دوطرفِ حقِّ مطلق و باطل مطلق تشکیل شدهاند و یکی از طرفین قدرتمندانه پیروز میشود و طرف مقابل بهشدت شکست میخورد، در مناظره‎های نیمایی اغلب طرفین مناظره به یکدیگر کمک میکنند تا هردو به حقیقت نزدیک شوند. شاعران معاصر در قالب و فرمی‎‎ نو که حاصل آزادی بیان در آفرینش هنری است، فضایی تعاملی ایجاد میکنند و در این فضای تعاملی به گفت‌وگو‎های دونفره، چندنفره یا خودگویی و حدیث نفس میپردازند و با بهره‎گیری از شخصیتهای نمادین، کارناوال و آشتی دادن عناصر متضاد در فضای مکالمهای به نقد اجتماعی میپردازند و به‌طورمعمول با بهرهگیری از گزاره‎های خطابی، فضایی چندصدا میآفرینند. واژه های کلیدی: شخصیتهای نمادین، کارناوال، گروتسک، گفت‌وگوی باختینی، مناظره های نو. * استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه کاشان taheri@kashanu.ac.ir (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) ** دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه کاشان marziehhemati@yahoo.com تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 23/6/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 2/11/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6505_75ff6670e51ecc345a6a705ac6293a63.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 Analysis and Comparison of Holism in ‘Attar’s Manṭeq Al-Ṭair and Modern Physics تحلیل و مقایسه ی کلیت گرایی در منطق الطیر عطار و فیزیک نوین 197 226 6428 10.22099/jba.2021.38423.3874 FA لیلا غلامپور آهنگرکلایی دانشجوی دکترای زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران محمود طاووسی استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران شهین اوجاقعلی زاده استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران Journal Article 2020 09 10 Analysis and Comparison of Holism in ‘Attar’s Manṭeq Al-Ṭair and Modern Physics Introduction Proposing a general model of the world has been considered by many physicists and philosophers since ancient Greece; since it seems tat this idea forms the basis of ‘Attar’s ideas in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair (the Conference of the Birds), this study analyzes and compares holism in ‘Attar's mystical ideas and modern physics. In holism, which was formed in the twentieth century, living beings are considered an “integrated whole” in which the properties of the components lay in its totality. “Such approaches are observed both in Chinese and ancient Iranian mysticism and also Ephesian, Platonic and Aristotelian thoughts.” (Golabi, 2017) Traces of holism can be observed in ancient Iranian or Khosravani Wisdom; he creation unity, which was interpreted as “existence unity” in Mola Sadra’s philosophy; the principle that has had a great influence on mystical thoughts. Although ‘Attar was impacted by the creation unity and humanism of the world in Khosravani Wisdom, unlike his predecessors, he achieved a new allegory, namely the scientific- philosophical allegory of the correspondence between the "particle of the world and the world of the particle". The abovementioned theory has a special status in the western wisdom and philosophy. (Zarrinkub, 1989) Keywords: Attar, Mantiq al-Tair, Holism, modern physics, Simorgh Research Findings Through studying ‘Attar’s works, it is inferred that he views the universe as a whole; That is, his view of the universe is based on "quantum communication"; since according to that, "there is only one constant whole." (Wolf, 2005) After describing the creation of the world in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair, ‘Attar, describes the particle and its relation to creation; in this vast sea of existence, the microscopic and macroscopic worlds are integrated (‘Attar, 2010) According to the modern physics “the beginning of the universe was in the form of an initial atom”. (Bryson, 2009) The birds are willing to go back to the origins of the existence that had a perfect harmony. “At the beginning of time, the world must have had perfect symmetry. All forces existed in one uniform phase force, but the world today is terribly asymmetric; since the four existing forces are in no way similar to each other” (Caco and Thomson, 2009) ; as in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair, when disorder prevailed, the birds tried to fine a single uniform phase force called “Simorgh”. Scientists believe that if the theory of integrity is correct, there are "fundamental similarities" in the creation of the universe. Physicists consider the origin of supersymmetry to be the beginning of creation. They see a way to reach symmetry through reconstructing it at the beginning of creation (the Big Bang), which can only be analyzed by its echoes in nature. According to ‘Attar, “everything” “here” is an echo “there”. "The world is full of hidden symmetries that come from breaking symmetry. In fact, if symmetry had never been broken, humans would not exist, because there was no atom." (lbid); Because stars and galaxies were made of atoms over millions of years due to the breaking of the original symmetry and the release of particles, and after billions of years, humans were made of atoms; as in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair, Si-Morgh (the thirty birds) emerged by the break of the early Simorgh. Also, Si-Morgh or the thirty birds (due to the lack of continuity) can show both the difference between the forces of existence and the breaking of the original symmetry (Simorgh). According to Copra, mystical thoughts are proper philosophical and logical basis for the theories of the contemporary sciences. The universal perception is based on two subjects: on is the unity of the phenomena and the other is the movement of the great universe. (Copra, 2006) And David Bohm calls it “all moving whole”. In Manṭeq Al-Ṭair, all birds of the world (all moving whole) try to fly towards Simorgh and it includes two main points: one is moving and the other is totality. According to Bohm, “although particles seem to be separate, in the deeper level of reality, in fact they are different aspects of a deep cosmic unity” (talbot, 2010); as in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair, the separate thirty birds( =Si-Morgh) , in a deeper level of reality, are in fact a deep cosmic unity (Simorgh). According to the modern physics, “when the core of the matter is reached, the nature seems to be manifested as a network of communication between the various components of a whole.” (Copra, 2006) After describing the creation of the universe in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair, ‘Attar points this complex network of communication between the components and the whole (lbid), with a fresh look; since like the contemporary physics world, the universe described by ‘Attar is an indivisible whole. Bohm, who has proposed the general relativity of Einstein in a more developed way, believes that: “One integrated thing, as opposed to the apparent separation of things at the level of the more unhidden order, is the broadly integrated whole of "everything else." (Bohm, 1980) In the Conference of the Birds(Manṭeq Al-Ṭair) also, the apparent separation of things at the level of the more unhidden order is displayed by the thirty birds(Si-Morgh) that is Simorgh in a hidden level/ according to Bohm: “Eventually, even the hidden and unhidden orders are mixed together” (lbid); like the mixture of the thirty birds (Si-Morgh) with Simorgh in the ending circular journey in Manṭeq Al-Ṭair that forms a symmetric pattern (like the yin and yang). Conclusion According to research findings, ‘Attar and the modern physics are both searching for an integrated whole; ‘Attar through the inner world and modern physics from the outer world. Reaching the integrated whole (Simorgh) has been the main motivation of the birds’ journey, which is in harmony with the idea of the poet's existential unity. Both believe that the integrated whole has appeared once at the beginning of creation, which in Attar's thought is interpreted as the original relation or the ancient mysteries, and is called hidden symmetry or supersymmetry by modern physics, and its re-experience is impossible according to both of them, but it can only be analyzed with advanced knowledge; according to physicists, by receiving its echo in nature, and according to ‘Attar, by reflecting it in the mirror of the heart. Einstein tried to "read the mind of god" by proposing the theory of "integrity", but his efforts and those of all physicists have so far failed. According to ‘Attar, the "ultimate truth" is unattainable. The conscious choice of the word Si-Morgh (thirty birds) over the word Simorgh (with the help of mathematical numbers) can evoke the concept of unity, symmetry, order and connection of existence better than any other word. ‘Attar has used the symbolic allegory of the correspondence of Si-Morgh (the thirty birds) with Simorgh (equivalent to the particle of the world) to show the hidden and unhidden order. According to him, although Si-Morgh (the thirty birds) appear to be unrelated (due to discontinuity) (thirty different birds), in the deep layers of the universe and the hidden order are Simorgh, which Bohm calls "relatively independent semi-wholes". References Ibn Arabi, Muhammad ben Ali (BE TA). Alfotohat Almakkiye. C4. Dar Sar. Beirut. Elyadeh, Mirchah (2007). Mythical Perspectives. Translated by Jalal Sattari.Tehran: Toos Publications Beraisen, Bill (2009) History of almost everything, Translated by Mohammad Taghi Faramarzi, Tehran: Maziar Publications. Bahar, Mehrdad (1996) Research in Iranian Mythology, Tehran, Agah Publications. Talbot, Maykel (2010). Holographic world. Translated by Daryush Mehrjouyi. Sixteenth edition. Tehran. Hermes Publications. Hafez, Shamso Al Din Mohammad (1999) Ghani and Qazvini correction, Tehran, Par Publications. Hosseini Shahroudi, Morteza and Fatemeh Farzali (2013) "Comparative study of the unity of man and the world in physics and mysticism", Journal of Islamic Studies - Philosophy and Theology, Vol. 45, pp. 91, 57-75. Razi, Hashem. (2000) Hekmat Khosravani. Tehran: Behjat Publications. Zarrin Koob, Abdo al-Hussein. (1989) Sir Ney, vol: 2, Tehran: Scientific Publications. Zamani, Behzad. (2007) Seeking unity from physics to mysticism. Tehran: Information. Tahmasebi, Sattar (2017) "Metaphysical Foundations of David Boehm Quantum Physics" (Focusing on the new idea of the holographic world). Two scientific-research quarterly philosophical reflections. No. 18, 125 - 155. Attar, Frid Al din (1987). Divane Attar. With the care and correction of Taqi Tafazli. Tehran. Book translation and publishing company. ــــــــــــــ. (2013). Asrarnameh. Corrected by Mohammad Reza Shafiei Kadkani. Sokhan. Tehran. ــــــــــــــ. (2010). Manteqo Al tteir. Corrected by Mohammad Reza Shafiei Kadkani. Sokhan. Tehran (Alef). ــــــــــــــ. (2010). Mokhtarnameh. Corrected by Mohammad Reza Shafiei Kadkani.Tehran: Sokhan (Be). Farshad, Mohsen (2008) "Quantum Physics and Molana Revelations". Aftab Asrar Quarterly. Year 2. Sh 8. pp. 46-57. Farnobogh Dadgi (2001). Bondehesh. Report by Mehrdad Bahar. second edition. Tehran: Toos Publications.Kapra, Feritioff (2006). Tao Physics. Translated by Habib Dadfarma. Tehran. Kayhan Publications. Kako and Thomson, Michio and Jennifer. (2009). Beyond Einstein. Translated by Dr. Reza Khazaneh. Fatemi. Tehran. Kaku, Michio. (2016). Parallel Worlds, Translated by Sara Izadyar and Ali Hadian. Thirteenth edition. Maziar. Tehran. Golabi, Siavash (1990) Human Resources Development in Iran; Sociology of Iranian Development, Tehran, Published by: Ferdows. Golshani, Mehdi (1985). Holism and causality in Boehm quantum physics. Academy of Sciences. Sh 4, 97 -110. Wolf, Fred Allen. (2005) Metaphysics from the perspective of physics (parallel times and worlds). Translated by Shahriar Shahrestani, Tehran: Yahoo. Hawking, Stephen (2007). The world in walnut shell. Translated by Mohammad Reza Mahjoub. Tehran. Harir Publications. ــــــــــــــ. (2011). History of time. Translated by Curush Zaeem. Third edition. Iranmehr. Tehran. Jung, Carl Gustav (2010) Man and His Symbols, Translated by Mahmoud Soltanieh, Tehran, Diba Printing House. - Bohm David, (1980), Wholeness and the Implicate order, London and New York, in Routledge classics, first published, p. 186 - Bohm, D .(1987).”Hideen Variables and the Lmplicate Order, “ in Quantum Lmplications, ed. (London: Roultledge & Keganpaul, 1987), p. 38. -Heisenberg, w., Physics and philosophy, New york: Harper Torchbooks, 1958. تحلیل و مقایسه ی کلیت گرایی در منطق الطیر عطار و فیزیک نوین لیلا غلامپور آهنگر کلایی* محمود طاووسی ** شهین اوجاقعلی‌زاده*** چکیده از یونان باستان تاکنون ارائهی مدلی کلی از جهان موردتوجه فیزیک‌دانان و فیلسوفان بسیاری بوده است. ازآنجاکه به نظر میرسد اندیشهی مذکور، اساس اندیشههای عطار را در منطقالطیر تشکیل میدهد؛ بنابراین این پژوهش به مقایسه و تحلیل کلیتگرایی در اندیشههای عرفانی عطار و فیزیک نوین میپردازد. مطابق نتایج، هم عطار در منطقالطیر و هم فیزیک نوین در جست‌وجوی کل یکپارچهاند. در منطقالطیر انگیزهی سفر گروهی تمام مرغان جهان برای رسیدن به سیمرغ، درواقع رسیدن به کل یکپارچه بوده است که در عرفان اسلامی به «وحدت وجود» تعبیر میشود. انتخاب آگاهانهی واژهی سیمرغ در برابر سی مرغ بیش از واژهی دیگر میتواند ارتباط، نظم، تقارن و یکپارچگی تمام موجودات جهان را برخلاف وجود اختلاف ظاهری (سی مرغ مختلف) و گوناگونی نیروهای هستی بیان کند. انیشتین (Albert Einstein) میخواست با نظریهی یکپارچگی، ذهن خدا را بخواند؛ اما تمام تلاشهای فیزیک‌دانان تاکنون برای رسیدن به کل یکپارچه با شکست مواجه شده است. ازنظر عطار هم یکپارچگی با حقیقت غایی (سیمرغ حقیقیگوهر) غیر ممکن است و سی مرغ تنها با حقیقت وجودی خویش (سیمرغ یا نخستین فعل الهی) به وحدت رسیدند که دیوید بوهم (David Bohm) این کل را «نیمهتمامیتهای نسبتاً مستقل» میخواند. واژه‌های کلیدی: تقارن، سیمرغ، عطار، کلیتگرایی، فیزیک نوین، منطق الطیر. * دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران lailagholampour@gmail.com (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) ** استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران tavoosi@riau.ac.ir *** استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران alizade@riau.ac.ir تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 16/7/1399 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 2/9/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6428_3eac4bc3279dec8e85e433b666ceb3b5.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 The Excellent Image of Shah Mansour in Hafez’s Poems سیمای درخشان «شاه منصور» در سروده‌های حافظ 227 256 6502 10.22099/jba.2021.41402.4100 FA امیرافشین فرهادیان دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ابوعلی سینا همدان علی محمدی استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ابوعلی سینا همدان Journal Article 2021 08 07 The Excellent Image of Shah Mansour in Hafez’s Poems Introduction: During Hafez's lifetime, several rulers came to power in Shiraz. From the Choupanids, Amir Pir Hussein, from the Injuids, Shah Mahmoud, Shah Massoud and Shah Abu Ishaq and from the Mozaffarids, Amir Mobarez, Shah Shoja, Shah Mahmoud, Sultan Zinal-Abedin, Shah Yahya and Shah Mansour. Some, such as Shah Shoja, ruled over Shiraz for a long time (more than two decades) and some, such as the Shah Yahya in a short period of time (less than a year). Due to his long association with the court, Hafez met and became acquainted with many princes and ministers. These interactions are widely reflected in Hafez's poems and the repetition of their names in his poems confirms this. Among the kings mentioned, he preferred three: Shah Abu Ishaq, Shah Shoja and Shah Mansour. Shah Mansour was the last king to rule in Shiraz during Hafez's lifetime, and the last years of Hafez's life were spent during his reign. A considerable number of Hafez's poems are dedicated to him in this short period of time, and it appears that the poet's interest and respect for this king is special. Methods and Literature review: The purpose of this article is to study the image of Shah Mansour Mozaffari in Hafez's poems and its comparison to valid historical sources by content analysis method (descriptive-analytical approach) In order to find a logical explanation for his prominent dignity with Hafez. About Shah Mansour Mozaffari in addition to the information contained in historical sources; The books "Shah Mansour, the Heavy mace champion" by Mohammad Ibrahim Bastani-Parizi and "Shah Mansour" by Ahmad Foroughbakhsh have been published. Also, since Shah Mansour is one of the famous praisers of Hafez, he has been mentioned in many works that have described Hafez's poems. Sahar Fereydoni in her article "The role of human factors in the fall of Shiraz during the reign of Shah Mansour (795 AH)" has studied the conquest of Shiraz by Timur Gurkhani. Hafez's political thought is a subject that has been studied in the book "Hafez's view of politics" by Fatemeh Zolfagharian and the articles: "Shiraz of Hafez's era and how to reproduce Iranshahri thought" by Azim Shahbakhsh and Omid Ghiasi, "Hafez's paradigmatic turmoil in dealing with politics" by Shamsi Parsa and "Interaction and confrontation of Hafez Shirazi's poetry with the political structure of power" by Mohammad Keshavarz Beizai et al. Discussion: The intensity of Hafez's attachment to Shah Mansour is evident through the poems he wrote for him. This interest, in addition to Shah Mansour benefiting from the characteristics of a desirable king, must have other reasons. To find the answer, there is no way but a more detailed analysis of Hafez's words, and this search must be based on the historical developments of that period. In the history of Iran, there have been several major attacks by foreigners that have caused irreparable damage to Iranians. These include the invasion of Alexander in the fourth century BC, the invasion of the Arabs in early Islam (early seventh century AD), the invasion of the Ghozs at the end of the Seljuk dynasty (twelfth century AD), the Mongol invasion at the end of the Khwarizm dynasty (thirteenth century). AD) and the invasion of Timur in the eighth century AH (late fourteenth century AD). Shah Mansour's rise to power coincides with one of the turning points in Iranian history, which is the invasion of Timur. In a poem composed by Hafez to congratulate Shah Mansour on his accession to the throne; Shah Mansour is counted against Timur, as the savior Mahdi against the Antichrist. It seems that considering Shah Mansour as the hero of the resistance was not limited to Hafez. The historical information left about not believing in Shah Mansour's assassination and waiting for his appearance for a long time after this incident is a proof that people looked at Shah Mansour as a savior. When fighting the domination of an alien invading power that has invaded the country; This attitude has a history among Iranians. Examples of hope for the return of the national hero in the role of savior include Bahram Varjavand in the Arab conquest and Jalal al-Din al-Khwarizmshah in the Mongol invasion. Hafez realized that none of Mozaffari's princes had the courage to face Timur. During Timur's first expedition to Fars; Sultan Zin al-Abedin; The son and successor of Shah Shoja, After hearing the horrific news of Timur's massacre in Isfahan and his move towards Shiraz, fled and headed for Khuzestan via Kazerun. Other princes of the Mozaffari dynasty welcomed Timur near Shiraz. But Shah Mansour's audacity in taking Shiraz from Timur and his successor, Shah Yahya; Confirmed Hafez's opinion and caused the people to consider him in that catastrophe, their savior from the danger of the Antichrist. Shah Mansour's uprising against Timur in that difficult situation caused him to find an excellent position with Hafez. Conclusion: Shuja al-Din Shah Mansour Mozaffari, the last king of the Mozaffari dynasty, has a special and privileged position among all those who have been praised by Hafez. Evidence from Hafez's poems shows that there was a close and intimate relationship between Hafez and Shah Mansour. This intensity of interest in the last years of life, in addition to the adaptation of Shah Mansour's characteristics to a desirable ruler, is linked to the conditions of the last decade of the eighth century. Shah Mansour is the only one who has the courage to stand against Timur, and that is why Hafez and many people look at him as a savior and hope for his victory. Among Hafez's poems for Shah Mansour, Mughniyehnameh, in which form and content are used to strengthen the mentality of patriotism and resistance, is of extraordinary importance and value. It is in this poem that once again, the value of the national epic as a stronghold of national identity and cultural ideals of Iran in the critical historical moments is manifested. Keywords: Shah Mansour Mozaffari, Hafez, Reflection of a Historical Event References: Adamova, Adele and Guzalian, Leon. (2004). Shahnameh drawings. Translated by Zohreh Faizi. Tehran: Academy of Arts. Ibn Arabshah. (1977). The wonders of the possible in the viceroys of Timur. Translated by Mohammad Ali Nejati. Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Company. Iqbal Ashtiani, Abbas. (2001). History of the Mongols. Tehran: Sahel. Ahvar, Parviz. (1989). Hafez, the mirror of history. Tehran: Shabaviz. Bastani Parizi, Mohammad Ibrahim. (1986). Shah Mansour:the Heavy mace champion. Tehran: Chakameh. Saghebfar, Morteza. (1998). Shahnameh of Ferdowsi and the Philosophy of Iranian History. Tehran: Moin. Jalalian, Abdul Hussein. (1999). Description of Hafez's poems. Tehran: Yazdan. Hafez Abru, Abdullah bin Lotfallah. (2001). Zubdat al-Tavarikh. Edited by Kamal HajSeyedJavadi, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. Hafez Abru, Abdullah bin Lotfallah. (1999), Geography of Hafez Abru, edited by Sadegh Sajjadi, Tehran: Written Heritage. Hafez, Shamsuddin Mohammad (1962), Divan of Hafez, edited by Hashem Razi, Tehran: Kaveh. Hafez, Shamsuddin Mohammad (1966), Divan of Khajeh Hafez Shirazi, by Seyyed Abolghasem Enjavi Shirazi, Tehran: Javidan Elmi. Hafez, Shamsuddin Mohammad (1996), Divan of Hafez, edited by Parviz NatelKhanlari, Tehran: Kharazmi. Hafez, Shamsuddin Mohammad (2011), Divan of Khajeh Shamsuddin Mohammad Hafez Shirazi, by Mohammad Qazvini and Qasem Ghani, Tehran: Zavar. Hasouri, Ali. (2008). Hafiz, from another perspective. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publishing. Hamidian, Saeed (2010). Description of enthusiasm: Description and analysis of Hafez's poems. Tehran: Qatre. Khleghi Motlagh, Jalal. (2005). "Hafez and the National Epic of Iran". Hafez Monthly. No. 19. pp. 33-36 Khandmir, Ghiasuddin bin Hommamuddin.(1978). Ministerial instructions, edited by Saeed Nafisi, Tehran: Iqbal. Khandmir, Ghiasuddin bin Hommamuddin.(1991). Habiba Al-Seeyar, edited by Mohammad DabirSiyaghi, Tehran: Khayyam Dolatshah Ibn Bakhtishah. (2003). Tazkereh al-Shoara ', edited by Edward Brown, Tehran: Asatir. Rastegar Fasaei, Mansour. (1989). "Ferdowsi and Hafez". Journal of Memory Research. Volume 2. pp. 47-109. Sotoudeh, Husseingholi (1967). History of Al-Muzaffar. Tehran: University of Tehran. Samarkandi, Kamaluddin Abdul Razzaq. (2004). Matla’ Al- Sa’dain and Majma’ Al- Bahrain. By Abdolhossein Navaee. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. Shami, Nizamuddin. (1984). Zafar-Nameh. By Panahi Semnani. Tehran: Bamdad. Shamisa, Sirus. (2016). Hafiz Notes. Tehran: Mitra. Shamisa, Sirus. (2018). The King of Books. Tehran: Hermes. Shahbakhsh, Azim and Ghiasi, Omid. (2019). "Shiraz in the era of Hafez and how to reproduce the thought of Iran-Shahri". Journal of Local Histories of Iran. No. 14. pp. 177-190. Ghani, Qasem. (2014/1942). History of Hafez era: History of Fars and neighboring states in the eighth century. Tehran: Zavar. Gheybi, Bijan. (2000). The coming of Shah Bahram Varjavand. Billfield: Nemoudar. Ferdowsi, Abolghasem (2009), Shahnameh of Ferdowsi, based on the Moscow version, Tehran: Payame Edalat. Farzad, Massoud. (1939). "Discovery of Hafez's Mughani-Nameh". Music. Nos. 1 and 2. pp. 17-29. Faranbagh Dadagi. (2001). Bondahesh. Translated by Mehrdad Bahar. Tehran: Toos. Fayyaz Anoush, Abolhassan and Azimi Zavareh, Neda and Alahyari, Fereydoun. (2018). " Typology of the confrontation of Iranian society after the Mongol invasion ". Journal of Historical Research. No. 38. pp. 101-120. Kotobi, Mahmoud. (1985). History of Muzaffarids, edited by Abdolhossein Navaee, Tehran: Amir Kabir. Knauth, Wolfgang. (1976). The ideal of the kingdom in ancient Iran. Translated by Seifuddin Najmabadi. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Arts Publications. Meskoub, Shahrokh. (2005). Armghane Moor: A research on Shahnameh. Tehran: Ney Publishing. Moin, Mohammad (1369). Hafez-e Shirinsokhan, by the efforts of Mahdokht Moein, Tehran: Moein. Unknown. (1975). Heavenly Wisdom. Translated by Ahmad Tafzali. Tehran: Iranian Culture Foundation. Niroo, Sirus. (1983). The treasure of Intent. Tehran: Sahar. Neysari, Salim. (2006). The Alterations in Hafez's poems. Tehran: Academy of Persian Language and Literature. Homayoun Farrokh, Rukn al-Din (1975). Hafez-e Kharabati. Tehran: Asatir. Yazdi, Sharafuddin Ali. (2008). Zafarnameh, edited by Seyed Saeed Mirsadegh and Abdolhossein Navaee, Tehran: Islamic Consultative Assembly Documentation Center. سیمای درخشان «شاه منصور» در سروده‌های حافظ امیرافشین فرهادیان * علی محمدی** چکیده بهره‌گیری حافظ از ظرفیت شعر برای بیان عقیده و جهت‌گیری نسبت به هسته‌ی قدرت سیاسی و رخدادها و تحولات آن عرصه، اهمیت رویکرد تاریخی- سیاسی در به‌دست‌دادن درک جامع‌تر و دقیق‌تر از شعر او را برجسته می‌‌کند. ارتباط نزدیک حافظ با دربار به‌دلیل جایگاهش به‌عنوان شاعری بهره‌مند از قبول خاطر خاص ‌و عام و نیز به‌اقتضای شغل دیوانی‌اش، موجب شده که او شناختی دقیق از شاهان و شاهزادگان و وزیران و دیگر رجال متنفذ عصر خویش داشته باشد. داوری حافظ نسبت به بسیاری از ایشان در سروده‌هایش بازتاب دارد. دراین‌میان تصویری که از شاه‌منصور مظفری در دیوان حافظ ترسیم شده است، جلوه‌گاه سیمای شاهی آرمانی و دلخواه است که در میان دیگر ممدوحان موردعلاقه‌ی شاعر، جایگاه ممتازی دارد. زمانی اهمیت این جایگاه بهتر درک می‌شود که توجه داشته باشیم حافظ این داوری را در سال‌های پایانی زندگی و از پس تجربه‌ی برآمدن و فرورفتن حاکمان و صاحب‌قدرتان پرشمار به دست می‌دهد. هدف این جستار بررسی سیمای شاه‌منصور مظفری در سروده‌های حافظ و انطباق آن با منابع تاریخی معتبر به روش تحلیل محتوا (رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی) است تا از رهگذار آن بتوان برای جایگاه سپند و ارجمند او نزد حافظ، توضیحی منطقی یافت. واژه‌های کلیدی‌: بازتاب رویداد تاریخی، حافظ، شاه‌منصور مظفری، مغنی‌نامه. * دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ابوعلی سینا همدان afshin.farhadian@gmail.com ** استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه ابوعلی سینا همدان khoshandam.ali2@gmail.com (نویسنده‌ی مسئول) تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 16/5/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 24/9/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6502_ce5bb500cdae78583f7168226df8acf9.pdf

دانشگاه شیراز شعر پژوهی(بوستان ادب) 2008-8183 14 2 2022 08 23 The last reading of the " Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn" خوانش واپس‌نگر « قصه‌ی شهر سنگستانِ» اخوان ثالث 257 284 6408 10.22099/jba.2021.41247.4093 FA فرشته محجوب استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران. Journal Article 2021 07 21 The last reading of the " Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn" 1.Introduction and introduction Among the various theories on semiotics and their evolution are the critical interests of the French-based American theorist Michael Rifatter (1924-2006), a structuralist linguist who specializes in semiotics. The poem is thought-provoking. In Rifater's semiotics, not only the reader's critical and creative effort is involved, but also his literary and linguistic knowledge and experiences are effective in understanding and receiving poetry. He based his theory on the nature and function of language in literary texts. Poetry deviates from its usual functions of understanding and receiving poetry based on the poem itself, using indirect language to refer to unnecessary things: changing the function of language in poetry from imitation to signage, creating grammatical statements in poetry, altering a central origin to create Poetry, the transformation of text into poetry by means of minimal writings with the three principles of multi-factor determination, transformation and expansion is one of the most important points in Rifater theory. 2.Research method, background and purpose The research method is descriptive-analytical and its purpose is to read the semiotic reading of the Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn following can be considered about the research background: 1.Shariati Siasar (2011) who in his dissertation entitled "Analysis of the second millennium of mountain deer based on the theory of Rifater semiotics" using the above theory to the origins of philosophical thought such as thinking in He has dealt with life and death, human existence and place in it, and destiny and philosophical doubt. 2.Najafi (1396) who has interpreted the " Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn " based on Kristova's theory and using the symbolic and symbolic matter. The analysis of this poem is based on the critique of poststructuralist semiotics. 3.Hypothesis (2012) that in the article "Archetypal Critique of the Poetry of the Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn Mehdi Akhavan Sales" examines the poem from the perspective of archetypal critique and based on the archetypes of hero, old, shadow and self He has analyzed and dealt with symbols such as tree, mountain, valley, cave and spring. 3.Discussion "The Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn Fabeli, which is narrated in a narrative manner and in a logical way from the language of two pigeons, and in it, most of the mythical themes, elements and characters are used. And the poet has even recreated myths according to the needs and events of the time and in opposition to the situation of society and based on his mentality. The main content of the poem is political and apparently its hero is Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh. In linear reading, "The Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn " consists of eight verses, according to which "The Akavan Sales's Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn " is the story of a prince whose people have been enchanted and turned to stone. Like the common customs of many folk tales, he seeks guidance from two pigeons. We see that it prevents us from considering poetry through imitation and merely representation of an event, but in the second stage because of the nature of the language of poetry in which the reader is faced with a chain of apostasy and contradiction. The poem must be read reactively in order to decipher the signs in the text. "Reactive" or "retrospective" or "non-dynamic" or "interpretive" reading is done in a non-sequential way and using literary power from the end to the beginning of the text as a review, revision and comparison. "During this process, the reader, by testing the hypothesis formed in exploratory reading, goes beyond the level of meaning and seeks the meanings of poetry, and finally the matrix or network of poetry, which is the basic proposition of poetry. "It recognizes and unites poetry." Reactive reading helps to interpret and analyze poetry using techniques such as "accumulation" and "descriptive systems". The four lexical chains of "loneliness", "silence", "despair" and "water" are the core of Sangestan's story collections. In the poetry of the Akavan Sales, there are three descriptive systems of pigeons, the city of Sangestan and the prince, and the most important descriptive system is related to the "prince". With instances of multifactorial determination, transformation, and expansion, the minimum spellings of each poem can be obtained. The "Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn " has been written around three minimalist inscriptions: The first paragraph: the captivity of Iran in the hands of thieves and colonialists. Article 2: Removing Obstacles with the Guidance of the Wise Men Article 3: The Disappointment of "Determining Multi-Factors" means that the signs in the language used in poetry do not refer to non-poetic beings but give rise to semantic networks. It turns out that the connections between its components are internal and self-directed. The signs of the poem " Ghese – e - shahr – e – Sangestsn " also refer not to meanings outside the text of the poem but to the other signs of the mentioned poem and therefore create a closed orbit of specific signs. The prince, the city of Sangestan, pirates, trees, wells, doves, fire, caves, mountains, valleys, springs and dreams are the multi-factor determinations of this system. "Expansion" in this poem has made possible the abstract theme of "despair and despair" to certain images. 4.Conclusion "The Tale of the City of Sangestan" is the product of the development of the origin of "despair and hopelessness" on which the meaning of the poem depends. This origin has expanded through processes such as accumulation, multifactorial determination, transformation, and descriptive systems. These components take poetry beyond the level of imitation, transform it into a meaningful and unified system, and can be analyzed with systematic semiotics. Has accepted. In this way, it can be seen that in the process of "accumulation", the Akavan Sales has chosen more objective words in the second chain, namely "despair and sorrow", which is the main theme of the issue, in order to make it more realistic. In "descriptive systems", the "prince" macro system is at the top of the other two micro-systems due to having more constellations. This confirms that poetry revolves around this character and the things that follow it. With the help of the "expansion" process, he has turned an abstract subject (despair) into three definite images, each of which corrects and intensifies the other. Keywords: Refater, retrospective reading, Sangestan city story, semiotics Sources and references Algun Junghani, Massoud. (1396). "Application of Rifater semiotic pattern in poetry reading". Research in Contemporary World Literature, University of Tehran, Volume 22, Number 1, pp. 33-57. Ahmadi, Babak. (2003) Text structure and interpretation. Centeral Tehran. Akhavan Sales, Mehdi. (1371) Poetry of our time 2. By Mohammad Haghoughi, Tehran: Negah. Eliadeh, Mircha. (2010) Perspectives on Myth. Translated by Jalal Sattari, Tehran: Toos. Scholes, Robert. (1398) An Introduction to Structuralism in Literature. Translated by Farzaneh Taheri, Tehran: Agah. Eagleton, Terry (2007) An Introduction to Literary Theory. Translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Center. Barakat, Behzad and Eftekhari, Tayebeh (1389). "Poetry Semiotics: The Application of Michael Rifater's Theory to a Poetry Border by Forough Farrokhzad". Tarbiat Modares University Comparative Language and Literature Research, Volume 1, Number 4, pp. 110-130. Billsker, Richard. (1388). Jung's Thought. Translated by Hossein Payende, Tehran: Ashian. Payende, Hossein. (1397) Literary Theory and Criticism, Vol. 2, Tehran: Samat. Hassanpour Alashti, Hussein and Ismaili, Murad. (1390). "The story of the mythical city of Sangestan". Tehran Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Volume 18, Number 68, pp. 42-67. Hassanzadeh Mir Ali, Abdullah and Ghanbari, Reza. (1392). "Morphological Analysis of the Story of Sangestan City", Literary Criticism and Stylistics Research, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, Volume 4, Number 13, pp. 67-91. Hasnoli, Kavous and Zanhari, Zeinab (1398). "Recovering New Origins from Folk Tales in the Poetry of Sangestan City by Mehdi Akhavan Sales". Public Culture and Literature of Tarbiat Modares University, Volume 7, Number 25, pp. 53-79. Hosseini, Maryam (1388). "Coding of the cave in the culture of nations and the friend of the cave in the poems of Rumi". Quarterly Journal of Mystical and Mythological Literature, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch. Volume 5, Number 15, pp. 35-53. Zumradi, Homeira. (1385). Comparative Critique of Religions and Myths. Tehran: Zavar. Saeedi, Sohrab (1393). Beliefs and beliefs of the people of Hormozgan. Qom: Dar al-Tafsir. Selden, Raman and Widowson, Peter. (1397). Handbook of Contemporary Literary Theory. Translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Ban. Saussure, Ferdinand (1967). General Linguistics Course. Translated by Kourosh Safavi, Tehran: Hermes. Seyed Hosseini, Reza (1387). Literary schools. Tehran: Negah. Shamisa, Sirus. (1383). The story of a soul. Tehran: Ferdows. Knight, Jean and Gerbran, Allen. (1384). Culture of symbols. Tehran: Jeyhun. Safavid, Cyrus. (1391). Scattered Writings (Book II) Semiotics and Literary Studies. Tehran: Scientific. Farzi, Hamid Reza (1391). "Critique of the ancient model of poetry in the city of Sangestan Mehdi Akhavan Sales". Mystical Literature and Mythology of Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Volume 8, Number 28, pp. 114-134. Carrick, Irnarima (1384). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theories. Translated by Mehran Mohajer, Tehran: Ad. Kardgar, Yahya. (1387). "Traces of Tudeh Culture in the Akavan Sales 's Poems with Emphasis on the Poetic Poetry of Sangestan". Journal of Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Volume 1, Number 57, pp. 335-364. Giro, Pierre (1380). Semiotics. Translated by Mohammad Nabavi, Tehran: Ad. Nabi Lu, Alireza (1390). "Application of Michael Rifater's semiotic theory in the analysis of Phoenix Nima's poetry". Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages, University of Tehran, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 81-93. Najafi, Zohra (1396). "Analysis of the symbolic and symbolic matter in Ghesey - e - shahr – e – Sangestsn story based on Kristova's theory". Research in Contemporary World Literature, University of Tehran, Volume 2, Number 2, pp. 615-639. Hall Kelvin and Nodby, Vernon Jay. (1375). Fundamentals of Jung Analytical Psychology. Translated by Mohammad Hossein Moqbel, Tehran: University Jihad. Helper, Hooray. (1387). Psychoanalysis and literature. Tehran: Sokhan. Jung, Carl Gustav. (1387). Man and his symbols. Translated by Mahmoud Soltanieh, Tehran: Jami. Riffaterre, Michael. (1978) .Semiotics Of Poetry. 1.cd. Bloomingston: Indiana University Press. ……………………………… (1983) .Text Production. 1.ed. New York: Columbia خوانش واپس نگر «قصه ی شهر سنگستانِ» اخوان ثالث فرشته محجوب* چکیده «قصهی شهر سنگستان» اخوان ثالث به‌دلیل ماهیت سیاسی ـ اجتماعی و نیز ظرفیتهای خاص و ساختار دیالکتیکی از برجستهترین نمونههای شعر معاصر است. مقالهی حاضر نخست به تبیین مبانی نظری نقد نشانه‌شناسی ریفاتر پرداخته و سپس بر مبنای آن و به شیوهی توصیفی ـ تحلیلی شعر مذکور را ازمنظر خوانش «اکتشافی» و سپس «واپس‌نگر» بررسی کرده است. حاصل این قیاس مبین آن است که «قصهی شهر سنگستان» محصول بسط خاستگاه «یأس و ناامیدی» است که دلالتمندی شعر به آن وابسته است. این خاستگاه ازطریق فرایندهایی همچون انباشت، تعین چندعاملی، تبدل و منظومههای توصیفی گسترش یافته است. مؤلفههای مذکور شعر را از سطح محاکات فراتر برده، آن را به منظومهای دلالتمند و واحد مبدل و با نشانه‌شناسی نظاممند تحلیل پذیرکرده است. بدین‌ترتیب میتوان دریافت اخوان در فرایند «انباشت»، در زنجیرهی دوم یعنی «یأس و اندوه» که بنای اصلی مبحث است، به‌منظور حقیقتنمایی بیشتر واژگانی عینیتر را برگزیده است. در «منظومههای توصیفی» منظومه‌ی کلان «شاهزاده» به‌دلیل داشتن اقمار فلکیِ بیشتر، در رأس دو منظومه‌ی خُرد دیگر قرار میگیرد. این امر مؤید آن است که شعر، گرد محور این شخصیت و اموری که بر آن مترتب است، میچرخد. به مدد فرایند «بسط» نیز موضوعی انتزاعی (ناامیدی) را به سه ایماژ متعین تبدیل کرده که هریک بر دیگری صحه میگذارد و آن را تشدید میکند. واژه‌های کلیدی: خوانش واپس‌نگر، ریفاتر، قصه ی شهر سنگستان، نشانه شناسی. * استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران f.mahjoub2022@pnu.ac.ir تاریخ دریافت مقاله: 2/5/1400 تاریخ پذیرش مقاله: 19/8/1400

https://jba.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6408_e9248a498346d884bf0283c91157c789.pdf